(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); Alot of talk goes on about parallel universes, but for this debate we should focus on Earth. Do you believe that there is a such thing as Earth′ ? I mean it only seems reasonable since every tree has a root(in a general sense there's probably a type of tree that has no root, but I'm not a botanist so...) why would parallel universes be any different?

I guess it can be considered a paradox, but we could answer it simply with spontanous generation, which HAS been disproved by some scientists however it kind of HAD to occur at one time.

Then no, that wouldn't make any sense considering the Earth is only a collection of matter. It wasn't created all at once, therefore there can be no "prime." Any parallel branches would relate back to individual particles rather than a collection, such as Earth.

well my idea is that the big bang was just the start
the big bang was caused by a giant beyond belief star that had a supernova
after that its remaining debris formed stars and repeated
some turning into planets and some stars
and that will go on forever
this is all just a theory but it seems pretty possible
because at the center of our galaxy it looks like something very big is there
but remember im just a young person and i guess making up a theory like that helps me process the thought of all that

This has what to do with what?



Do you have any clue what the Big Bang was, or are you just making this stuff up as you go along?



It's called a supermassive black hole... every galaxy has one. This is only one of a few hundred billion galaxies, so I'm not really sure how that relates to anything you just said.



It would probably help more if you learned what these things actually are instead of making up your own explanations.


Sorry if I came off as being mean, but I felt the need to jump in on this one.

But wouldn't that mean that each particle would need a prime? And what if those prime particles had came to gather to make Earth, it could be considered Earth prime?

And even if a only single prime particle was destroyed that would destroy any parallel branch that the particle was located in.

Particles can't be destroyed however . It violates conservation of matter and energy.

Haha Touché

But the Law of Conservation of Matter and Energy states

"The Law of Conservation of Energy states that energy cannot be created or destroyed, but can change its form."

What if the particle was moved or altered in a way which would cause Earth to cease to exist? That would dislocate all of the particles into different areas of the "prime" universe

The whole notion of the "prime" isn't really valid in the first place.

The theory goes that when a quantum wave collapses, the universe splits into two where one state exists in one branch an vice versa. The original particle no longer exists, and whatever you do to one has no effect on the other unless they are entangled, so the whole concept is flawed.

I actually dont know how that had any relevancy
I guess 3 hours of sleep really takes its toll on you
i guess my mind got mixed up
ADD much?
isnt there a such thing as dark matter which is extremely reactive to normal matter
and some scientists believe that there are dark matter galaxies??
sorry but space and all is pretty complex

Makes sense, I really can't debate much when we start discussing quantum mechanics (if I'm even using the right term) since I don't have much knowledge of it. But based upon your knowledge of the subject it seems to make sense that an alteration of something in one universe would not have an effect on another universe.

Hopefully there is someone on NGU who can possibly counter your argument.:beer: