Originally posted by xinfectedsoulx
In my opinion, we either have a Queen that has power, such as back in the Tudor days, or we have a President. Like you have already mentioned, the Queen does **** all. She "promotes" Britain by going to meet other countries president or whatever they have, but apart from that, I believe she doesn't do anything else. I read in the paper not too long ago that she wants MORE money than what she is getting. She gets (I think it was, don't hold me too it) £14million a year, and she still wants more. Parliament is ****ed anyway. It takes too long to pass a law. Then it has to go to be approved by the Queen, of which, by the way, if she denies the law, then it is most likely going to be the end of the monarchy. I forgot why, but that's what a teacher told me last year. So again, that proves the fact she has no power if she HAS to pass a law. The monarchs are joke. They are all this and that, for what you said, "accidental birth". They are all stuck up their own arses.
I'm sure that there can be a referendum on whether the monarchy should be abolished which the queen would have no input on. However, the country as a whole would never vote the queen out, i'm all up for having a President, which would be the current prime minister (although I wouldn't be too happy on Cameron having the role