(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); So, which do you think is better? Move or Kinect?

ps move, imo you need something in your hand to interact with.
kinect just uses your image and although you interact more with kinect, i still prefer ps move (get ready for the fanboys to come in)

Move just seems like an updated version of the Wii. You sit doing the same thing as you do with the Wii, holding something in your hand and pointing and so on. There is not much potential I can see with it where the Wii won't be able to go.

Kinect is like an updated version of the ITOY. You don't need anything to hold onto or stand onto for it to understand what you are doing, such as the Wii or move. I can see potential in where it will go, be able to do this and that. For now though it will just be little party games, but in the future it could be anything from acting like a footballer kicking the ball, dribbling the ball and so on, to acting like a soldier in CoD. It will soon be limited by the imagination of the game developers. That's my non fanboy opinion.

PS Move. In the long run it will prove to be better.

The kinect games and what not seem a little boring to me while the move's games seems more fun. If you want a kinect for the ps3, buy an eye toy.

id say neither but my experiences with the eye toy were terrible and boring quite easily. both probably want to attack nintendos business with the wii fit next by being physically active on both ps3 and xbox.

all in all, i would rather be holding something in my hand like the wii but prefer a controller, than standing in front of a motion camera and who knows how well it would be.

I don't like motion detection games in the first place, but being the PS3 fanboy that I am, I have to go with the Move. Not only that, but the hardware is even more intellectual than the Wii's controller. The ball at the end allows the camera to pick up the sensor easily at any angle. The Kinect just doesn't sound reliable to me in the first place. So yeah, definitely the Move.