Originally posted by NoMooreMercy
Because they're living in tents behind Walmart, and begging for money & food on the streets?
Because their mentally insane, not trying enough to get a job, or drug addicts.
Originally posted by another user
So what does that mean for the working-class people? Should they just be forgotten and thrown to the side? They're the ones actually doing all of the hard, physical labor.
Thats a matter of opinion. I feel it is the leaders of the company who do all the work--they merely tell the manual workers what to do.
Originally posted by another user
In a command economy, 0% are unemployed.
And there are problems in that economy. See the fall of the USSR
Originally posted by another user
When the business first started, yes, they did. But now? These people are born into riches and are able to attend top-notch schools at the expense of the middle & working-class.
Inherited CEOs make significantly less than the makers of the companies. And those CEOs usually have worked their way up the latter through the company or have led a business before.
Originally posted by another user
Still way too much when a coal miner who performs backbreaking work makes around $31,000 & a soldier who risks his life everyday in combat is paid $30,000.
A soldier is actually paid less, around $12,000 a year. Its called service for a reason. And that pay for the coal miner is fine if it still attracts workers to the job. You will learn in economics about supply and demand, that if the pay is too low they will not get enough workers and will have to raise the pay to attract workers to that job.
Originally posted by another user
So let's just ship the jobs off to Vietnam & China, where they will work! Great idea! The CEOs can still be paid their outrageous amounts and the business will still be profitable!
When you outsource, other jobs are created here. Goods are cheaper, and our trade relations build. They make stuff, and they will purchase it as well.
Originally posted by another user
Not in particular, there are plenty of miners who live in poor regions of Kentucky/Tennessee where they're slicing the tops off of mountains and the debris from the mountains is clouding their air, and destroying their rivers. It's taking away jobs from these working-class men and women, because it's more profitable for the business to do so.
Whoevers property that river is should sue the company then for being negligent.
Originally posted by another user
BP isn't going to fix this problem, do you really think a multi-trillion dollar corporation is going to give two shits about the environment?
Yes, they care about the reputation about their company. People will think twice about buying gas from BP if they leave their oceans filled with oil.
Originally posted by another user
The government needs to step in, fix the problem already, and impose tighter restrictions on off-shore drilling so we can possibly prevent this from happening in the future.
No they dont. They need to tell BP they need to clean it up, and find ways so that problem doesnt happen again. It will benefit BP and the government.
Originally posted by another user
A spill of this magnitude will take 10-15 years to return to normal.
Then so be it. Mistakes happen, and the American people would rather have gas than a clean ocean.
Originally posted by another user
What else can a CEO possibly be doing? Sitting at their desks? Taking flights to Vietnam & China to meet with branch managers?
They do a lot of things behind the scenes.
Originally posted by another user
The responsibility of the chief executive officer is to align the company, internally and externally, with their strategic vision. The core duty of a CEO is to facilitate business outside of the company while guiding employees and other executive officers towards a central objective. The size and sector of the company will dictate the secondary responsibilities. A CEO must have a balance of internal and external initiatives to build a sustainable company
Not only that, anybody can be in a factory and build things. Not everybody can make speeches, market their product, manage a whole company. They also have a lot more responsibility on their backs; their decision could make their company go bankrupt and loose thousands of jobs. Manual workers cannot make that bad of decisions.
Originally posted by another user
All while the people lower in the company are busting their balls working in steel mills or working in a factory.
So be it, they accept the pay that is given to them and they do it.
Originally posted by another user
He was lucky enough to do so, Capitalism has winners and losers; the vast majority lose.
Capitalism has competition which fuels an increase in technology and makes products cheaper and better. Communism doesn't.
Originally posted by another user
So much for American Democracy right?
Then get the **** out of America. We were founded upon captitalsm, not communism. Go to Russia which was funded on communism.
Originally posted by another user
How would inflation increase?
Take an economics class, I'm tired of explaining this to you.
Originally posted by another user
The tea party movement and other fascist coalitions SCREAMED over "death panels" and other nonsense in the healthcare "reform" bill, but ending social security.. isn't that the exact opposite thing they didn't want?
Social Secruirty =/= Health Care
When you make health care government run, their is no competition. Companies dont strive to become better and beat their competitors, they do as little as needed to get by and get paid by the government.
Originally posted by another user
Would you ever want to try hard if you were under a brutal dictator like Joseph Stalin? If anything, you do as little as possible just to get the job done. I'm fascinated by the Soviet Union under Stalin, but I don't like the guy. He was brutal, arrogant and a prick. Lenin & Trotsky were the true leaders of the Bolsheviks, Stalin was out for himself.
A country cant have a main dictator. People are always out for themselves.
Originally posted by another user
Not everyone is behind the idea, obviously why people take advantage of the system.
Everyone is out for themselves. They want to do the least amount of work for the most amount of pay. I would much rather be a janitor than a doctor and getting the same pay.
Originally posted by another user
Not everyone WANTS to be a doctor, and even so, how does someone living in Compton achieve a good education?
They get a public education. They get strait As, and go off to college to make up for any deficiencies and achieve a better education.
Originally posted by another user
Yeah, because EVERYONE wants to go through college and EVERYONE can be leaders.
Everyone cant hack it through college. Everyone cant be a leader. Everyone cant be a follower either.
Originally posted by another user
Everyone needs to be paid the same, a farmer, a lawyer, a banker, everyone.
Get the **** out of America, and go have some buttsex with the fallen Soviet Union because Communism is shit. Seriously.
Originally posted by another user
I want a job now, can I get it? No.
How old are you? I got a job when I was 16.
Originally posted by another user
I want a lot of things out of this life, and I've only been successful in a few. So I'm supposed to try and try and try until I'm 59 and then I finally get my great position, and then it's time to retire? Yeah... no.
Which is why your average, will get an average pay and be an average worker. Everyone cant be a leader.
If you want a job with good pay, research them now and find what you have to do to get there.