Post: Why Battle Field Is BETTER Than CoD.
Options
01-16-2011, 02:48 AM
#1
Mr. DarkKV
League Champion
For mods: I will be talking about CoD and BFBC so I was unsure where to post this.
Theres a 90% chance I will get flamed, but this just shows how many CoD fan-boys there are on this forum.
Before I start I want to say that I enjoy BOTH games, but over the last 2 days have preferred one of them.
Before I start I want to say that I enjoy BOTH games, but over the last 2 days have preferred one of them.
Why BFBC2 Is better than Co
1. There is NO quick-scoping.
Quickscoping is NON realistic! Seriously, if in real life you had a Intervention and tried to quick scope it would kill you or you would be blind forever. Without QS it makes the game more realistic. A more realistic game = a better game.
2. Balances
In BFBC2 they update / fix gun, vehicle and equipment balances constantly with 'live fixes'. Now what have 3arc done about the really bad balances on CoD? Hmm lets see, they nerfed the AK74u... And thats it.
3. LAG LAG AND LAG
BFBC2 has dedicated servers, meaning no hosts. No hosts = NO LAG.
I have played BFBC2 for over a YEAR now and I have NEVER experienced 1 second of lag! On MW2 and BO I have lagged under the map, now thats bad.. My connection is 20mbps so I have a good connection...
4. Gravity
If you have ever played BFBC2, if your using a recon class (That's a sniper class for you CoD fan-boys) You will notice that you have to aim sligtly higher than your target if your shooting long distance, this is because of a MAGICAL thing called gravity.. This pulls your bullet down, It also means you have to shoot your rockets higher than your target. Because of GRAVITY
5. Destructible environment
This adds to the realism of the game... You can blow up anything you see!
I bet the 3arc didn't add a distributable environment because they were scared it would lag out too much. ahahah
6. Vehicles
Yes you drive a quad bike, Humvee, loads of helicopters, and loads of tanks on multilayer! Now lets see what can you drive on the CoD series... Umm a bike on campaign... HA
7. Team work
Teamwork in BFBC2 is a MUST! If you don't work as a team you WILL lose. This adds to the game realism, because on CoD you just run around separately with NO teamwork or cooperation!
8. Camping
On BFBC2 there is no camping! the map is so huge its pointless to camp..
And CoD ever second corner you turn you see a guy camping with a claymore or a heartbeat sensor...
9. Hacks...
All the CoD's have been hacked and modded. There is not ONE mod or hack for BFBC2. This makes the game legit enjoyable and FUN!
10. Overall game feel
CoD just feels fake.. because yeah your really gonna get shot with a sniper and then go to last stand kill the guy who shot you and then get up 30 seconds later.. CoD its more of a cartoon game if you know what I mean...
BFBC2 just feels real, there is not one aspect of BF that I can think of that makes it less of a joy to play or less realistic.
1. There is NO quick-scoping.
Quickscoping is NON realistic! Seriously, if in real life you had a Intervention and tried to quick scope it would kill you or you would be blind forever. Without QS it makes the game more realistic. A more realistic game = a better game.
2. Balances
In BFBC2 they update / fix gun, vehicle and equipment balances constantly with 'live fixes'. Now what have 3arc done about the really bad balances on CoD? Hmm lets see, they nerfed the AK74u... And thats it.
3. LAG LAG AND LAG
BFBC2 has dedicated servers, meaning no hosts. No hosts = NO LAG.
I have played BFBC2 for over a YEAR now and I have NEVER experienced 1 second of lag! On MW2 and BO I have lagged under the map, now thats bad.. My connection is 20mbps so I have a good connection...
4. Gravity
If you have ever played BFBC2, if your using a recon class (That's a sniper class for you CoD fan-boys) You will notice that you have to aim sligtly higher than your target if your shooting long distance, this is because of a MAGICAL thing called gravity.. This pulls your bullet down, It also means you have to shoot your rockets higher than your target. Because of GRAVITY
5. Destructible environment
This adds to the realism of the game... You can blow up anything you see!
I bet the 3arc didn't add a distributable environment because they were scared it would lag out too much. ahahah
6. Vehicles
Yes you drive a quad bike, Humvee, loads of helicopters, and loads of tanks on multilayer! Now lets see what can you drive on the CoD series... Umm a bike on campaign... HA
7. Team work
Teamwork in BFBC2 is a MUST! If you don't work as a team you WILL lose. This adds to the game realism, because on CoD you just run around separately with NO teamwork or cooperation!
8. Camping
On BFBC2 there is no camping! the map is so huge its pointless to camp..
And CoD ever second corner you turn you see a guy camping with a claymore or a heartbeat sensor...
9. Hacks...
All the CoD's have been hacked and modded. There is not ONE mod or hack for BFBC2. This makes the game legit enjoyable and FUN!
10. Overall game feel
CoD just feels fake.. because yeah your really gonna get shot with a sniper and then go to last stand kill the guy who shot you and then get up 30 seconds later.. CoD its more of a cartoon game if you know what I mean...
BFBC2 just feels real, there is not one aspect of BF that I can think of that makes it less of a joy to play or less realistic.
BFBC2 is also better because Hells said so lol
Here is a video that will help you not be a noob on BFBC2:
[ame="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mbz8n8N7eis&feature=related"]YouTube - Battlefield Bad Company 2 - How Not To Be A Noob[/ame]
That's all I have to say, prob gonna get de-rep'ed a shit load from CoD fanboys but I don't care
Here is a video that will help you not be a noob on BFBC2:
[ame="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mbz8n8N7eis&feature=related"]YouTube - Battlefield Bad Company 2 - How Not To Be A Noob[/ame]
That's all I have to say, prob gonna get de-rep'ed a shit load from CoD fanboys but I don't care
The following 40 users say thank you to Mr. DarkKV for this useful post:
Gaia, Alt, 0xFa1z, Ada Wong, Analdogfag, Assassin, aZlan, B u X, Blueflames, Comic Book Guy, Cooler, danielsarpa, Drake, Febreze, freeze-, Gangsta_hotdog, ginjaninja88, IcyDose, Janne, Kidd Cold, LordOlliee, MBO, Mr Nice, Mr.Kane, MrChazzX14, NeedaFlameSoon, Night Wolf, Nknights23, Octavia, PacMan', Pillar2365, Post Count, sauronith, Scouse_Dom, ShinigamiUzi, Slay No More, Tuhoaja, Tundmatu, xPottsy, xxzero26xx
01-16-2011, 07:21 AM
#11
MythGavin
Gym leader
Originally posted by Mr.
For mods: I will be talking about CoD and BFBC so I was unsure where to post this.
Theres a 90% chance I will get flamed, but this just shows how many CoD fan-boys there are on this forum.
Before I start I want to say that I enjoy BOTH games, but over the last 2 days have preferred one of them.
Before I start I want to say that I enjoy BOTH games, but over the last 2 days have preferred one of them.
Why BFBC2 Is better than Co
1. There is NO quick-scoping.
Quickscoping is NON realistic! Seriously, if in real life you had a Intervention and tried to quick scope it would kill you or you would be blind forever. Without QS it makes the game more realistic. A more realistic game = a better game.
Realism doesn't always mean fun. If CoD didn't have "quickscoping" the sniper rifle wouldn't even be able to compete with such small maps(See Black Ops). but back to the topic, you know what els is unrealistic? Fighting a war through your television screen.
2. Balances
In BFBC2 they update / fix gun, vehicle and equipment balances constantly with 'live fixes'. Now what have 3arc done about the really bad balances on CoD? Hmm lets see, they nerfed the AK74u... And thats it.
As much as I'm not a fan of black ops if you think thats the only thing that treyarch as done to fix balance since release then you're a silly goose. See their forums to see all the shit they did.
3. LAG LAG AND LAG
BFBC2 has dedicated servers, meaning no hosts. No hosts = NO LAG.
I have played BFBC2 for over a YEAR now and I have NEVER experienced 1 second of lag! On MW2 and BO I have lagged under the map, now thats bad.. My connection is 20mbps so I have a good connection...
Fair enough, although gaming is a lot better on PC, and there is also dedicated servers for CoD on PC aswell.
4. Gravity
If you have ever played BFBC2, if your using a recon class (That's a sniper class for you CoD fan-boys) You will notice that you have to aim sligtly higher than your target if your shooting long distance, this is because of a MAGICAL thing called gravity.. This pulls your bullet down, It also means you have to shoot your rockets higher than your target. Because of GRAVITY
How could you even bring this up in a comparison with CoD? The Maps in CoD are too small for noticeable bullet drop to even occur IRL...
5. Destructible environment
This adds to the realism of the game... You can blow up anything you see!
I bet the 3arc didn't add a distributable environment because they were scared it would lag out too much. ahahah
Actually they didn't have anymore memory...
6. Vehicles
Yes you drive a quad bike, Humvee, loads of helicopters, and loads of tanks on multilayer! Now lets see what can you drive on the CoD series... Umm a bike on campaign... HA
I can ride my bike with no handle bars
No.. In all seriousness why the hell would you even want Vehicles in CoD. SMALL MAPS BRO. Get into a quad, drive 50 feet, hit the edge of the map.
7. Team work
Teamwork in BFBC2 is a MUST! If you don't work as a team you WILL lose. This adds to the game realism, because on CoD you just run around separately with NO teamwork or cooperation!
If you needed team work to win all the time in CoD then my w/l ration would be 0.03. I'm not the person to play in a part all day and 97% of people who play CoD are casual BK randys. Not saying thats the case for Battlefield though, just saying if this was incorporated in to CoD, it would suck.
8. Camping
On BFBC2 there is no camping! the map is so huge its pointless to camp..
And CoD ever second corner you turn you see a guy camping with a claymore or a heartbeat sensor...
Huge Maps = Less action.
Less Action = Less fun.
P.S. Who the **** uses a heartbeat sensors? And if you die from one, then GTFO off of commando...
9. Hacks...
All the CoD's have been hacked and modded. There is not ONE mod or hack for BFBC2. This makes the game legit enjoyable and FUN!
Lol, thats because no one cares about it enough to even bother.
Black Ops is just as hack-proof as battlefield is, if not more, and people are still finding ways to get shit done anyways, BTW look what site your on.
10. Overall game feel
CoD just feels fake.. because yeah your really gonna get shot with a sniper and then go to last stand kill the guy who shot you and then get up 30 seconds later.. CoD its more of a cartoon game if you know what I mean...
BFBC2 just feels real, there is not one aspect of BF that I can think of that makes it less of a joy to play or less realistic.
Video games aren't supposed to be real, Sims are. Battlefield isn't realistic either, more realistic than CoD but not realistic as far as real life goes, want to know why? If they made it anymore realistic it would be 10x more boring than it already is.
1. There is NO quick-scoping.
Quickscoping is NON realistic! Seriously, if in real life you had a Intervention and tried to quick scope it would kill you or you would be blind forever. Without QS it makes the game more realistic. A more realistic game = a better game.
Realism doesn't always mean fun. If CoD didn't have "quickscoping" the sniper rifle wouldn't even be able to compete with such small maps(See Black Ops). but back to the topic, you know what els is unrealistic? Fighting a war through your television screen.
2. Balances
In BFBC2 they update / fix gun, vehicle and equipment balances constantly with 'live fixes'. Now what have 3arc done about the really bad balances on CoD? Hmm lets see, they nerfed the AK74u... And thats it.
As much as I'm not a fan of black ops if you think thats the only thing that treyarch as done to fix balance since release then you're a silly goose. See their forums to see all the shit they did.
3. LAG LAG AND LAG
BFBC2 has dedicated servers, meaning no hosts. No hosts = NO LAG.
I have played BFBC2 for over a YEAR now and I have NEVER experienced 1 second of lag! On MW2 and BO I have lagged under the map, now thats bad.. My connection is 20mbps so I have a good connection...
Fair enough, although gaming is a lot better on PC, and there is also dedicated servers for CoD on PC aswell.
4. Gravity
If you have ever played BFBC2, if your using a recon class (That's a sniper class for you CoD fan-boys) You will notice that you have to aim sligtly higher than your target if your shooting long distance, this is because of a MAGICAL thing called gravity.. This pulls your bullet down, It also means you have to shoot your rockets higher than your target. Because of GRAVITY
How could you even bring this up in a comparison with CoD? The Maps in CoD are too small for noticeable bullet drop to even occur IRL...
5. Destructible environment
This adds to the realism of the game... You can blow up anything you see!
I bet the 3arc didn't add a distributable environment because they were scared it would lag out too much. ahahah
Actually they didn't have anymore memory...
6. Vehicles
Yes you drive a quad bike, Humvee, loads of helicopters, and loads of tanks on multilayer! Now lets see what can you drive on the CoD series... Umm a bike on campaign... HA
I can ride my bike with no handle bars
No.. In all seriousness why the hell would you even want Vehicles in CoD. SMALL MAPS BRO. Get into a quad, drive 50 feet, hit the edge of the map.
7. Team work
Teamwork in BFBC2 is a MUST! If you don't work as a team you WILL lose. This adds to the game realism, because on CoD you just run around separately with NO teamwork or cooperation!
If you needed team work to win all the time in CoD then my w/l ration would be 0.03. I'm not the person to play in a part all day and 97% of people who play CoD are casual BK randys. Not saying thats the case for Battlefield though, just saying if this was incorporated in to CoD, it would suck.
8. Camping
On BFBC2 there is no camping! the map is so huge its pointless to camp..
And CoD ever second corner you turn you see a guy camping with a claymore or a heartbeat sensor...
Huge Maps = Less action.
Less Action = Less fun.
P.S. Who the **** uses a heartbeat sensors? And if you die from one, then GTFO off of commando...
9. Hacks...
All the CoD's have been hacked and modded. There is not ONE mod or hack for BFBC2. This makes the game legit enjoyable and FUN!
Lol, thats because no one cares about it enough to even bother.
Black Ops is just as hack-proof as battlefield is, if not more, and people are still finding ways to get shit done anyways, BTW look what site your on.
10. Overall game feel
CoD just feels fake.. because yeah your really gonna get shot with a sniper and then go to last stand kill the guy who shot you and then get up 30 seconds later.. CoD its more of a cartoon game if you know what I mean...
BFBC2 just feels real, there is not one aspect of BF that I can think of that makes it less of a joy to play or less realistic.
Video games aren't supposed to be real, Sims are. Battlefield isn't realistic either, more realistic than CoD but not realistic as far as real life goes, want to know why? If they made it anymore realistic it would be 10x more boring than it already is.
Here is a video that will help you not be a noob on BFBC2:
You must login or register to view this content.
Didn't watch the whole thing (Got Bored)
That's all I have to say, prob gonna get de-rep'ed a shit load from CoD fanboys but I don't care
You must login or register to view this content.
Didn't watch the whole thing (Got Bored)
That's all I have to say, prob gonna get de-rep'ed a shit load from CoD fanboys but I don't care
Responce:Bold
Don't think I'm a CoD fanboy... I'm just trying to say they're two different games. They shouldn't even be compared. And I personally find Battlefield Boring.
*** Sorry for all the reposts there was something wrong with the forums at time of post ***
The following user thanked MythGavin for this useful post:
01-16-2011, 07:28 AM
#12
Shootprado
Newton Nation 1
Originally posted by flawedvictory
Responce:Bold
Don't think I'm a CoD fanboy... I'm just trying to say they're two different games. They shouldn't even be compared. And I personally find Battlefield Boring.
---------- Post added at 02:12 AM ---------- Previous post was at 02:10 AM ----------
Responce:Bold
Don't think I'm a CoD fanboy... I'm just trying to say they're two different games. They shouldn't even be compared. And I personally find Battlefield Boring.
---------- Post added at 02:18 AM ---------- Previous post was at 02:12 AM ----------
1.Realism doesn't always mean fun. If CoD didn't have "quickscoping" the sniper rifle wouldn't even be able to compete with such small maps(See Black Ops). but back to the topic, you know what els is unrealistic? Fighting a war through your television screen.
2. As much as I'm not a fan of black ops if you think thats the only thing that treyarch as done to fix balance since release then you're a silly goose. See their forums to see all the shit they did.
3.Fair enough, although gaming is a lot better on PC, and there is also dedicated servers for CoD on PC aswell.
4. How could you even bring this up in a comparison with CoD? The Maps in CoD are too small for noticeable bullet drop to even occur IRL...
5. Actually they didn't have anymore memory...
6. I can ride my bike with no handle bars
No.. In all seriousness why the hell would you even want Vehicles in CoD. SMALL MAPS BRO. Get into a quad, drive 50 feet, hit the edge of the map.
7. If you needed team work to win all the time in CoD then my w/l ration would be 0.03. I'm not the person to play in a part all day and 97% of people who play CoD are casual BK randys. Not saying thats the case for Battlefield though, just saying if this was incorporated in to CoD, it would suck.
8. Huge Maps = Less action.
Less Action = Less fun.
P.S. Who the **** uses a heartbeat sensors? And if you die from one, then GTFO off of commando...
9. Lol, thats because no one cares about it enough to even bother.
Black Ops is just as hack-proof as battlefield is, if not more, and people are still finding ways to get shit done anyways, BTW look what site your on.
10. Video games aren't supposed to be real, Sims are. Battlefield isn't realistic either, more realistic than CoD but not realistic as far as real life goes, want to know why? If they made it anymore realistic it would be 10x more boring than it already is.
Company 2 - How Not To Be A Noob[/url]
Didn't watch the whole thing (Got Bored)
Don't think I'm a CoD fanboy... I'm just trying to say they're two different games. They shouldn't even be compared. And I personally find Battlefield Boring.
Oh, and Just because someone doesn't like battlefield doesn't mean that their a fanboy.
kthanks.
---------- Post added at 02:18 AM ---------- Previous post was at 02:18 AM ----------
1.Realism doesn't always mean fun. If CoD didn't have "quickscoping" the sniper rifle wouldn't even be able to compete with such small maps(See Black Ops). but back to the topic, you know what els is unrealistic? Fighting a war through your television screen.
2. As much as I'm not a fan of black ops if you think thats the only thing that treyarch as done to fix balance since release then you're a silly goose. See their forums to see all the shit they did.
3.Fair enough, although gaming is a lot better on PC, and there is also dedicated servers for CoD on PC aswell.
4. How could you even bring this up in a comparison with CoD? The Maps in CoD are too small for noticeable bullet drop to even occur IRL...
5. Actually they didn't have anymore memory...
6. I can ride my bike with no handle bars
No.. In all seriousness why the hell would you even want Vehicles in CoD. SMALL MAPS BRO. Get into a quad, drive 50 feet, hit the edge of the map.
7. If you needed team work to win all the time in CoD then my w/l ration would be 0.03. I'm not the person to play in a part all day and 97% of people who play CoD are casual BK randys. Not saying thats the case for Battlefield though, just saying if this was incorporated in to CoD, it would suck.
8. Huge Maps = Less action.
Less Action = Less fun.
P.S. Who the **** uses a heartbeat sensors? And if you die from one, then GTFO off of commando...
9. Lol, thats because no one cares about it enough to even bother.
Black Ops is just as hack-proof as battlefield is, if not more, and people are still finding ways to get shit done anyways, BTW look what site your on.
10. Video games aren't supposed to be real, Sims are. Battlefield isn't realistic either, more realistic than CoD but not realistic as far as real life goes, want to know why? If they made it anymore realistic it would be 10x more boring than it already is.
Company 2 - How Not To Be A Noob[/url]
Didn't watch the whole thing (Got Bored)
Don't think I'm a CoD fanboy... I'm just trying to say they're two different games. They shouldn't even be compared. And I personally find Battlefield Boring.
Oh, and Just because someone doesn't like battlefield doesn't mean that their a fanboy.
kthanks.
---------- Post added at 02:19 AM ---------- Previous post was at 02:18 AM ----------
1.Realism doesn't always mean fun. If CoD didn't have "quickscoping" the sniper rifle wouldn't even be able to compete with such small maps(See Black Ops). but back to the topic, you know what els is unrealistic? Fighting a war through your television screen.
2. As much as I'm not a fan of black ops if you think thats the only thing that treyarch as done to fix balance since release then you're a silly goose. See their forums to see all the shit they did.
3.Fair enough, although gaming is a lot better on PC, and there is also dedicated servers for CoD on PC aswell.
4. How could you even bring this up in a comparison with CoD? The Maps in CoD are too small for noticeable bullet drop to even occur IRL...
5. Actually they didn't have anymore memory...
6. I can ride my bike with no handle bars
No.. In all seriousness why the hell would you even want Vehicles in CoD. SMALL MAPS BRO. Get into a quad, drive 50 feet, hit the edge of the map.
7. If you needed team work to win all the time in CoD then my w/l ration would be 0.03. I'm not the person to play in a part all day and 97% of people who play CoD are casual BK randys. Not saying thats the case for Battlefield though, just saying if this was incorporated in to CoD, it would suck.
8. Huge Maps = Less action.
Less Action = Less fun.
P.S. Who the **** uses a heartbeat sensors? And if you die from one, then GTFO off of commando...
9. Lol, thats because no one cares about it enough to even bother.
Black Ops is just as hack-proof as battlefield is, if not more, and people are still finding ways to get shit done anyways, BTW look what site your on.
10. Video games aren't supposed to be real, Sims are. Battlefield isn't realistic either, more realistic than CoD but not realistic as far as real life goes, want to know why? If they made it anymore realistic it would be 10x more boring than it already is.
Company 2 - How Not To Be A Noob[/url]
Didn't watch the whole thing (Got Bored)
Don't think I'm a CoD fanboy... I'm just trying to say they're two different games. They shouldn't even be compared. And I personally find Battlefield Boring.
Oh, and Just because someone doesn't like battlefield doesn't mean that their a fanboy.
kthanks.
---------- Post added at 02:20 AM ---------- Previous post was at 02:19 AM ----------
1.Realism doesn't always mean fun. If CoD didn't have "quickscoping" the sniper rifle wouldn't even be able to compete with such small maps(See Black Ops). but back to the topic, you know what els is unrealistic? Fighting a war through your television screen.
2. As much as I'm not a fan of black ops if you think thats the only thing that treyarch as done to fix balance since release then you're a silly goose. See their forums to see all the shit they did.
3.Fair enough, although gaming is a lot better on PC, and there is also dedicated servers for CoD on PC aswell.
4. How could you even bring this up in a comparison with CoD? The Maps in CoD are too small for noticeable bullet drop to even occur IRL...
5. Actually they didn't have anymore memory...
6. I can ride my bike with no handle bars
No.. In all seriousness why the hell would you even want Vehicles in CoD. SMALL MAPS BRO. Get into a quad, drive 50 feet, hit the edge of the map.
---------- Post added at 02:21 AM ---------- Previous post was at 02:20 AM ----------
Can't post my reply...Apparently its 10,000 characters long when its only about 1,000....
Don't think I'm a CoD fanboy... I'm just trying to say they're two different games. They shouldn't even be compared. And I personally find Battlefield Boring.
---------- Post added at 02:12 AM ---------- Previous post was at 02:10 AM ----------
Responce:Bold
Don't think I'm a CoD fanboy... I'm just trying to say they're two different games. They shouldn't even be compared. And I personally find Battlefield Boring.
---------- Post added at 02:18 AM ---------- Previous post was at 02:12 AM ----------
1.Realism doesn't always mean fun. If CoD didn't have "quickscoping" the sniper rifle wouldn't even be able to compete with such small maps(See Black Ops). but back to the topic, you know what els is unrealistic? Fighting a war through your television screen.
2. As much as I'm not a fan of black ops if you think thats the only thing that treyarch as done to fix balance since release then you're a silly goose. See their forums to see all the shit they did.
3.Fair enough, although gaming is a lot better on PC, and there is also dedicated servers for CoD on PC aswell.
4. How could you even bring this up in a comparison with CoD? The Maps in CoD are too small for noticeable bullet drop to even occur IRL...
5. Actually they didn't have anymore memory...
6. I can ride my bike with no handle bars
No.. In all seriousness why the hell would you even want Vehicles in CoD. SMALL MAPS BRO. Get into a quad, drive 50 feet, hit the edge of the map.
7. If you needed team work to win all the time in CoD then my w/l ration would be 0.03. I'm not the person to play in a part all day and 97% of people who play CoD are casual BK randys. Not saying thats the case for Battlefield though, just saying if this was incorporated in to CoD, it would suck.
8. Huge Maps = Less action.
Less Action = Less fun.
P.S. Who the **** uses a heartbeat sensors? And if you die from one, then GTFO off of commando...
9. Lol, thats because no one cares about it enough to even bother.
Black Ops is just as hack-proof as battlefield is, if not more, and people are still finding ways to get shit done anyways, BTW look what site your on.
10. Video games aren't supposed to be real, Sims are. Battlefield isn't realistic either, more realistic than CoD but not realistic as far as real life goes, want to know why? If they made it anymore realistic it would be 10x more boring than it already is.
Company 2 - How Not To Be A Noob[/url]
Didn't watch the whole thing (Got Bored)
Don't think I'm a CoD fanboy... I'm just trying to say they're two different games. They shouldn't even be compared. And I personally find Battlefield Boring.
Oh, and Just because someone doesn't like battlefield doesn't mean that their a fanboy.
kthanks.
---------- Post added at 02:18 AM ---------- Previous post was at 02:18 AM ----------
1.Realism doesn't always mean fun. If CoD didn't have "quickscoping" the sniper rifle wouldn't even be able to compete with such small maps(See Black Ops). but back to the topic, you know what els is unrealistic? Fighting a war through your television screen.
2. As much as I'm not a fan of black ops if you think thats the only thing that treyarch as done to fix balance since release then you're a silly goose. See their forums to see all the shit they did.
3.Fair enough, although gaming is a lot better on PC, and there is also dedicated servers for CoD on PC aswell.
4. How could you even bring this up in a comparison with CoD? The Maps in CoD are too small for noticeable bullet drop to even occur IRL...
5. Actually they didn't have anymore memory...
6. I can ride my bike with no handle bars
No.. In all seriousness why the hell would you even want Vehicles in CoD. SMALL MAPS BRO. Get into a quad, drive 50 feet, hit the edge of the map.
7. If you needed team work to win all the time in CoD then my w/l ration would be 0.03. I'm not the person to play in a part all day and 97% of people who play CoD are casual BK randys. Not saying thats the case for Battlefield though, just saying if this was incorporated in to CoD, it would suck.
8. Huge Maps = Less action.
Less Action = Less fun.
P.S. Who the **** uses a heartbeat sensors? And if you die from one, then GTFO off of commando...
9. Lol, thats because no one cares about it enough to even bother.
Black Ops is just as hack-proof as battlefield is, if not more, and people are still finding ways to get shit done anyways, BTW look what site your on.
10. Video games aren't supposed to be real, Sims are. Battlefield isn't realistic either, more realistic than CoD but not realistic as far as real life goes, want to know why? If they made it anymore realistic it would be 10x more boring than it already is.
Company 2 - How Not To Be A Noob[/url]
Didn't watch the whole thing (Got Bored)
Don't think I'm a CoD fanboy... I'm just trying to say they're two different games. They shouldn't even be compared. And I personally find Battlefield Boring.
Oh, and Just because someone doesn't like battlefield doesn't mean that their a fanboy.
kthanks.
---------- Post added at 02:19 AM ---------- Previous post was at 02:18 AM ----------
1.Realism doesn't always mean fun. If CoD didn't have "quickscoping" the sniper rifle wouldn't even be able to compete with such small maps(See Black Ops). but back to the topic, you know what els is unrealistic? Fighting a war through your television screen.
2. As much as I'm not a fan of black ops if you think thats the only thing that treyarch as done to fix balance since release then you're a silly goose. See their forums to see all the shit they did.
3.Fair enough, although gaming is a lot better on PC, and there is also dedicated servers for CoD on PC aswell.
4. How could you even bring this up in a comparison with CoD? The Maps in CoD are too small for noticeable bullet drop to even occur IRL...
5. Actually they didn't have anymore memory...
6. I can ride my bike with no handle bars
No.. In all seriousness why the hell would you even want Vehicles in CoD. SMALL MAPS BRO. Get into a quad, drive 50 feet, hit the edge of the map.
7. If you needed team work to win all the time in CoD then my w/l ration would be 0.03. I'm not the person to play in a part all day and 97% of people who play CoD are casual BK randys. Not saying thats the case for Battlefield though, just saying if this was incorporated in to CoD, it would suck.
8. Huge Maps = Less action.
Less Action = Less fun.
P.S. Who the **** uses a heartbeat sensors? And if you die from one, then GTFO off of commando...
9. Lol, thats because no one cares about it enough to even bother.
Black Ops is just as hack-proof as battlefield is, if not more, and people are still finding ways to get shit done anyways, BTW look what site your on.
10. Video games aren't supposed to be real, Sims are. Battlefield isn't realistic either, more realistic than CoD but not realistic as far as real life goes, want to know why? If they made it anymore realistic it would be 10x more boring than it already is.
Company 2 - How Not To Be A Noob[/url]
Didn't watch the whole thing (Got Bored)
Don't think I'm a CoD fanboy... I'm just trying to say they're two different games. They shouldn't even be compared. And I personally find Battlefield Boring.
Oh, and Just because someone doesn't like battlefield doesn't mean that their a fanboy.
kthanks.
---------- Post added at 02:20 AM ---------- Previous post was at 02:19 AM ----------
1.Realism doesn't always mean fun. If CoD didn't have "quickscoping" the sniper rifle wouldn't even be able to compete with such small maps(See Black Ops). but back to the topic, you know what els is unrealistic? Fighting a war through your television screen.
2. As much as I'm not a fan of black ops if you think thats the only thing that treyarch as done to fix balance since release then you're a silly goose. See their forums to see all the shit they did.
3.Fair enough, although gaming is a lot better on PC, and there is also dedicated servers for CoD on PC aswell.
4. How could you even bring this up in a comparison with CoD? The Maps in CoD are too small for noticeable bullet drop to even occur IRL...
5. Actually they didn't have anymore memory...
6. I can ride my bike with no handle bars
No.. In all seriousness why the hell would you even want Vehicles in CoD. SMALL MAPS BRO. Get into a quad, drive 50 feet, hit the edge of the map.
---------- Post added at 02:21 AM ---------- Previous post was at 02:20 AM ----------
Can't post my reply...Apparently its 10,000 characters long when its only about 1,000....
I will NOT read all this crap you repeat to MUCH
---------- Post added at 02:28 AM ---------- Previous post was at 02:28 AM ----------
No.. In all seriousness why the hell would you even want Vehicles in CoD. SMALL MAPS BRO. Get into a quad, drive 50 feet, hit the edge of the map.
---------- Post added at 02:21 AM ---------- Previous post was at 02:20 AM ----------
Can't post my reply...Apparently its 10,000 characters long when its only about 1,000....[/QUOTE]
I will NOT read all this crap you repeat to MUCH
The following user thanked MythGavin for this useful post:
01-16-2011, 07:32 AM
#15
xLeBron6James
LeBron > Kobe
The following user thanked xLeBron6James for this useful post:
01-16-2011, 07:34 AM
#16
NeedaPVHAXSoon
Guest
The ONLY thing i HATE about this game is how it feels to walk around, it's just not as smooth as in CODs. Just don't like that little part. However, this is a pretty good game, vehicles do get on my nerves every now and then though when some fag gets in one and keeps raping me. This game is comparable to Call of Duty. The simple movements are harder though which is a huge :n:
01-16-2011, 11:49 AM
#18
TheRandomGuy128
Hates Grammar Nazis
I 100% agree Battlefield is sooo much better than mw2 Sniping is a challenge but you feel amazing when you snipe a helicopter pilot (I got lucky(whatever skill)) vehicles are balanced unlike W@W overpowered tanks and its just soo much tactial Blow up a wall or whenever u can't plant on rush say F it and demolish the building
(I got lucky(whatever skill)) vehicles are balanced unlike W@W overpowered tanks and its just soo much tactial Blow up a wall or whenever u can't plant on rush say F it and demolish the building
01-16-2011, 12:54 PM
#19
Mr. DarkKV
League Champion
Originally posted by MrJC
First of all it's just your opinion so it's not a fact. Also why are you insulting other ngu members by calling them fanboys? And it's also a video game, it's not supposed to be like the real war.
This is a fact, its not my opinion that there's dedicated servers.. THERE ARE DEDICATED SERVERS! And if your a fanboy thats your problem... I'm not insulting you. I'm just saying there are loads of fanyboys on this forum.
And if you don't want a WAR game to be like real war, what do you want to do? Jump 50 feet in the air and then commando knife someone from 5 feet away.?
---------- Post added at 12:54 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:45 PM ----------
Originally posted by flawedvictory
Responce:Bold
Don't think I'm a CoD fanboy... I'm just trying to say they're two different games. They shouldn't even be compared. And I personally find Battlefield Boring.
*** Sorry for all the reposts there was something wrong with the forums at time of post ***
Don't think I'm a CoD fanboy... I'm just trying to say they're two different games. They shouldn't even be compared. And I personally find Battlefield Boring.
*** Sorry for all the reposts there was something wrong with the forums at time of post ***
Trust me when I say this...
Huge Maps = More action
More action = More fun.
Small maps = less fun
Less fun = Camping and commando knifing.
Copyright © 2026, NextGenUpdate.
All Rights Reserved.
