Originally posted by RobinDaBank1
how much do you reckon outside broadcasters paid to show coverage of the wedding? my guess an awful lot more than £20mill. so i think we actually profited from it, not to mention tourism
i have to agree, yes it may have been over hyped but it definitely increased tourism, many Americans and Australians where at the wedding which means more money for us, plus the expenses other countries have to pay to broadcast it, and considering it was watched globally i would think that would be quite a sum. overall i do think it was over hyped and i really couldn't care less but i completely disagree with people who say the government lended all our money (taxpayers) to help out with the wedding without getting a fair amount back from the advertising and tourism.