Post: Conspiracy or not?
09-11-2011, 07:39 AM #1
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); Okay I had to make this because I'm pissed off about dumb ass hicks saying 9/11 was done by the government or some shit. I mean all the proof points to a terrorist attack. Then their arguments are almost has stupid has they are. Like the towers couldn't have collapsed like that just by JUMBO JETS FILLED WITH JET FUEL crashing into them. So tell me what you think, was it an actual attack or a cover up? If you could't notice I believe it was a attack.
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
09-11-2011, 07:55 AM #2
p/11 was terrorist not government and **** anyone who says it wasnt ****ign terrorist they can go to hell

The following user groaned Glittery Penis Skittle for this awful post:

RavagedBoom
09-11-2011, 08:20 AM #3
I.Am.Swift
Michael Jordan
I reckon 9/11 was terrorists, but I havent looked into it or anything, just my opinion
09-11-2011, 12:30 PM #4
xinfectedsoulx
Daddy's home.
I believe it was an inside job. The fact that the building falling straight down would mean support beams would have to be damaged at the bottom. The plane crashed at the top. Now before you say the heat softened the beams, it would have cooled down a hell of a lot 90 floor down. Probably not hot enough to soften the beams.

The building burned for 2 hours before it collapsed. Now why is it a building like that would be able to burn for 2 hours and collapse, when other buildings can burn for days and still not collapse, vertically, like they did?

WTC 7 didn't get hit, yet that also fell straight down. Now, if you believe that jet fuel softened the beams on WTC 1&2 all the way down 90+ floors, knowing that jet fuel burns at a high temp, how is that a building full of office furnishings (paper, computers, chairs, desks etc that wouldn't burn any where near the heat required to soften a steel beam) can bring down a building EXACTLY like jet fuel did? If the building got damaged on one side, wouldn't the building fall towards the damaged side rather than straight down?

It also so happens to be that the plane that was meant for the White house was the one that coincidently got overran by passengers. Seems a bit strange to me that no other plane gets overran but the one heading towards the most important building in America.

Seems weird that a the Pentagon looked like the wall had been sawed in half, like a controlled demo would do, and a plane that's like 90ft long just vanished into thin air.

Now I also believe that the Bin Laden was fake too. I think he died ages ago. I have heard 3 different accounts of where SEAL Team 6 trained. One was in a disused part of a Base abroad (Afghanistan I think). Another was in the middle of woods in America and the other was in the desert in Nevada. Now, if they trained, wouldn't they have known where they trained and not swap it around all the time.

Also the helicopter that crashed was supposedly due to the high walls around the house trapping warm air and sending it upwards, the only way it can go. This cut out the blades causing it to stall and crash. Now, the team new the weather conditions, they set it up for a night like that without a moon. Surely a special forces pilot who would have clocked up thousands of hours of flying time would realise that landing above the building wouldn't work and cause what happened to happen, no? They also used specially adapted Blackhawks to do the missions. Kitted out with stealth tech and more silent blades. They get into Pakistan undetected because of this. But when they are leaving, they need the help of the support team and their Chinooks, which are not stealthy. How is it that they get into Pakistan undetected by radar, land and get out without the Pakistanis aware and scrambling jets to shoot them down, which they had every right to?
09-11-2011, 02:01 PM #5
Stack0verfl0w
Computer engineer
Originally posted by Phobick View Post
Okay I had to make this because I'm pissed off about dumb ass hicks saying 9/11 was done by the government or some shit. I mean all the proof points to a terrorist attack. Then their arguments are almost has stupid has they are. Like the towers couldn't have collapsed like that just by JUMBO JETS FILLED WITH JET FUEL crashing into them. So tell me what you think, was it an actual attack or a cover up? If you could't notice I believe it was a attack.

Are news read through a prompter. What are evil government tells. 9/11 was planned out. They needed to make concept fresh. Since the war on drug's & communism seem to die out. They needed the war on terror to start fictional war. The said thing is people bought into this Gaspkay:. Even worse over 2,000 u.s citizen had to die for this sick plan. Then to make fool of us they put obama to power. They thought maybe a black man might grab the people attention & fool them. Oh we see a black man he will help u.s he know's what were going through. Sad thing is people bought into this Gaspkay:. If someone can tell me 1 thing. Beside put us in more debt and never brought troops out of iraq that Obama helped us with. Wasn't that what he was campaigning non stop on. I have face the fact's were living a matrix are t.v, video games,Music star, movie star,Sports stars more............ is here to keep us far from researching the truth. I only fear this will get 10x worse as life progress. They guys engineered the stock market crash. The crazy thing was i laughed when a lot congress men reported. That there was a bill to bailout a lot of elite people but congress was going to deny it. They told congress if they do not the stock will drop 1,000 points the sky will fall and there will be Marshall law No.
09-11-2011, 03:53 PM #6
Default Avatar
Jeff
Guest
I like how you people use the word Terrorist. Theres a diffrence between Terrorists and criminals.
09-11-2011, 04:27 PM #7
020king
< ^ > < ^ >
your government has got u scared of a man in a turban, it was an inside job, how can people, walk through airport secuirity n then hijack planes, an crash them, like if i hijacked a plane i wouldn't know how to control it, it was a professional job, an if i was a terrorists i would have targeted the white house, ur government just hired bin laden so he can take the blame, basically hiding behind him, the government is the real terrorists, i dnt care ther is noooo way these terrorists know how to ride a plane lol, its obvious a inside job,
09-11-2011, 05:24 PM #8
Default Avatar
Jeff
Guest
Originally posted by 020king View Post
your government has got u scared of a man in a turban, it was an inside job, how can people, walk through airport secuirity n then hijack planes, an crash them, like if i hijacked a plane i wouldn't know how to control it, it was a professional job, an if i was a terrorists i would have targeted the white house, ur government just hired bin laden so he can take the blame, basically hiding behind him, the government is the real terrorists, i dnt care ther is noooo way these terrorists know how to ride a plane lol, its obvious a inside job,


You obviously missed the point of 9/11 if you think this way
1) There was lightened Secruity before 9/11, you could easily walk through airports with anything.
2) Its not hard to hijack a plane when there plenty of you with guns...
3) It was more than likely planned for months, and they probebley had pilot training beforehand, youre just assuming that because theyre saudi arabian that theyre stupid.
4) Why target the white house? Its an easy rebuild, and not a big financial loss. Plus the WTC held wayyyyy more people. They did it to strike fear into americans, not ruin America.
09-11-2011, 10:14 PM #9
Stack0verfl0w
Computer engineer
Originally posted by 020king View Post
your government has got u scared of a man in a turban, it was an inside job, how can people, walk through airport secuirity n then hijack planes, an crash them, like if i hijacked a plane i wouldn't know how to control it, it was a professional job, an if i was a terrorists i would have targeted the white house, ur government just hired bin laden so he can take the blame, basically hiding behind him, the government is the real terrorists, i dnt care ther is noooo way these terrorists know how to ride a plane lol, its obvious a inside job,

Yes you are right.............
09-11-2011, 10:28 PM #10
RavagedBoom
Sing My Guitar
Originally posted by X View Post
p/11 was terrorist not government and **** anyone who says it wasnt ****ign terrorist they can go to hell


Every year thousands of people march around ground zero demanding a criminal investigation of the attacks. How can we be sure that Osama wasn't made by the government? How do we know it wasn't an inside job? We can't; but just because people think it may have been a cover up and want to look into doesn't mean they should go to hell.

Copyright © 2026, NextGenUpdate.
All Rights Reserved.

Gray NextGenUpdate Logo