(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); is like comparing an apple vs an orange. Both are fruits, right? But they're both so different in color, taste, texture and feel. That's how I see this on going argument about which game is better, MW3 or BF3. It all seriously boils down to personal preference, some like apples, others like oranges and some even like both. They're both games, but differ in so many aspects that comparing them isn't fair and always lead to some unwanted flame war.

That's a good point.

But MW3 looks good already, I don't see any changes that need to be made so far. I just hope the multiplayer is redesigned and doesn't use the exact same edited-a-little-engine like BO did with MW2. :fa:

All I know is when I wanna sit and down and play a video game, I don't wanna have to trek 10 ****ing miles in game just to find somebody to kill.

Like kids, I try not to compare them, I have times when I love/hate both of them

Sledgehammer games has already said that the graphics are totally different. and if you are comparing MW2 to some MW3 images on the internet its not 100% accurate. not all mw3 images on the net are real

if you are concerned about same graphics?? than read this

You must login or register to view this content.

You say tomato and I say tomato. Meh

@OP Exactly. However I have a genuine hatred for Activision for how they milk their franchises to death so I'm sticking to BF3, and just pirating MW3 for the single player.

they both sound the same to me.. haha :smile:

You say ketchup I say tomato sauce.

They're are both great games imo