Post: MW3 vs BF3.....
10-30-2011, 09:02 PM #1
420
Kush Friendly
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); is like comparing an apple vs an orange. Both are fruits, right? But they're both so different in color, taste, texture and feel. That's how I see this on going argument about which game is better, MW3 or BF3. It all seriously boils down to personal preference, some like apples, others like oranges and some even like both. They're both games, but differ in so many aspects that comparing them isn't fair and always lead to some unwanted flame war.
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

The following 4 users say thank you to 420 for this useful post:

Clutch Hunterr, Liquid8, Vaner
11-02-2011, 12:46 AM #20
Mw2 vs bf3? Well as you said you can't really compare them.
11-02-2011, 01:25 AM #21
fux
|̶͇̿ ̶͇̿ ̶͇̿Winky Winky
Originally posted by A
Mw2 vs bf3? Well as you said you can't really compare them.


loll hi r u new 2?
11-02-2011, 01:26 AM #22
Originally posted by Seizure View Post
loll hi r u new 2?
haha yea im new 2 welcome to the site <3 we can be buds here
11-02-2011, 01:27 AM #23
fux
|̶͇̿ ̶͇̿ ̶͇̿Winky Winky
Originally posted by A
haha yea im new 2 welcome to the site <3 we can be buds here


maybe if your coolSmile
11-02-2011, 03:36 AM #24
Uber
Haxor!
You really cannot compare the two.

Call of duty isn't for the mature people. It CAN be, but it usually isn't. Unlike BF, it's not as team based, strategy based and etc..

When you play battlefield, you don't see children screaming :lol: :lol: I PWN3D YOO :carling: as much as you do on call of duty.

Tl;dr Call of duty is for the lighter gamers, whereas BF3 is for the more serious ones.
11-02-2011, 03:52 AM #25
I love this sense of elitism and bias BF3 players have towards their game. Most of them usually are the ones who are either terrible at Call Of Duty, or complain about it incessantly. If you aren't good at a game, and are unable to adapt to the challenge, don't automatically discount the game as bad. Maybe you are the one that needs change, not the series. Both games are unique experiences, whichever one is better is entirely based upon personal taste.

The following 2 users groaned at Rip The Jacker for this awful post:

Janne, KilllerPanda
11-02-2011, 08:46 AM #26
Originally posted by Legaljuana View Post
I love this sense of elitism and bias BF3 players have towards their game. Most of them usually are the ones who are either terrible at Call Of Duty, or complain about it incessantly. If you aren't good at a game, and are unable to adapt to the challenge, don't automatically discount the game as bad. Maybe you are the one that needs change, not the series. Both games are bound to be unique experiences, whichever one is better is entirely based upon personal taste and opinion. It is highly dependent on mindset.

No, I just don't like recent CoDs (MW2 & BO), because they are either very boring or unbalanced, not because I would suck at them. They will never change the engine, that's why people are complaining.

The following user groaned Janne for this awful post:

Rip The Jacker
11-02-2011, 09:00 AM #27
IceSt0rm9868
Save Point
battlefield 3 made a huge mistake being released so early .... it gave MW3 a chance to better itself by correcting the mistakes of battle field 3 . So i think MW3 is gonna be way better :wtf:
11-02-2011, 07:51 PM #28
Originally posted by Ropponen View Post
No, I just don't like recent CoDs (MW2 & BO), because they are either very boring or unbalanced, not because I would suck at them. They will never change the engine, that's why people are complaining.


Is the engine so poorly done that it needs renovation? I play the game daily; the engine is perfectly fine as it is, and still provides a smooth and fast-paced experience.

Copyright © 2026, NextGenUpdate.
All Rights Reserved.

Gray NextGenUpdate Logo