Originally posted by GQGK
no. you said nothing was true in it at all. which means jesus didnt exist. but now you say he does meaning there is something true in his statement.
You are the quote-mining king. I said his claims were based on no proof (the logical inference of anyone other than a quote-miner), which they weren't. He made no claim as to the existence of the Jesus figure.
Originally posted by GQGK
because the claims jesus lived is very true. and saying he did no miracles is absurd when most scientists agree many things in the bible cannot be disputed. you cant prove a virgin birth, but you can prove stars moved when it happened, which astrologists have proved based on the way the earth moves.
Wrong. Astrologists do not study the cosmos, they make predictions of the future based on irrational beliefs of a connection between our lives and star placement.
Originally posted by GQGK
you can prove every first born was killed around 7ad (when christ was actually born because of a miscalculation in the calendar, which i'm sure you wont dispute because its common knowledge) because i went to israel and i saw the graves from the first century of hundreds of thousands of children.
wrong again. In the first century is was actually extremely common for children to die..
Originally posted by GQGK
i used to dispute a lot of the bible. i've seen so much stuff first hand its impossible to dispute it for me anymore.
Like what? You haven't said anything.
Originally posted by GQGK
its like telling a kid in africa about snow. in most parts they wont even believe you. but they see it first hand and they cant fight it.
LOL! comparing omnipotent, omnipresent, magical, invisible creatures to an easily explained weather phenomenon.