To be honest I think this article is supposed to be a joke. I'll show you why:
Originally posted by another user
If the theory of gravity were true, it would show that the sun's gravitational force on the moon is much stronger than the earth's gravitational force on the moon, so the moon would go around the sun.
Originally posted by another user
Because if the moon's “gravity” were responsible for a bulge underneath it, then how can anyone explain a high tide on the opposite side of the earth at the same time? Anyone can observe that there are 2 -- not 1 -- high tides every day. It is far more likely that tides were given us by an Intelligent Creator long ago and they have been with us ever since. In any case, two high tides falsifies gravity.
Originally posted by another user
For example, astronomers, who seem to have a fetish for gravity, tell us that the moon rotates on its axis but at the same time it always presents the same face to the earth. This is patently absurd.
And now to info that I will actually spend my time on:
Originally posted by another user
For example, the observed behavior of the earth revolving around the sun can be perfectly explained if the sun has a net positive charge and the planets have a net negative charge, since opposite charges attract and the force is an inverse-square law, exactly as the increasingly discredited Theory of Gravity.
Electronegativity is billions of times stronger than the force of gravity, so we would have plummeted into the sun before the planet had even formed. Not to mention that wouldn't make sense - why would there be sections of matter of the complete opposite charge?
Originally posted by another user
The US Patent Office has never issued a patent for anti-gravity.
They also have a patent for an AIDS cure. That doesn't mean it works. Anti-gravity does not exist. There is no repelling force to gravity.
Originally posted by another user
Even Isaac Newton, said to be the discoverer of gravity, knew there were problems with the theory. He claims to have invented the idea early in his life, but he knew that no mathematician of his day would approve his theory, so he invented a whole new branch of mathematics, called fluxions, just to “prove” his theory. This became calculus, a deeply flawed branch having to do with so-called “infinitesimals” which have never been observed. Then when Einstein invented a new theory of gravity, he, too, used an obscure bit of mathematics called tensors. It seems that every time there is a theory of gravity, it is mixed up with “fringe” mathematics.
This person clearly has never taken a calculus course.
Originally posted by another user
Gravity totally fails to explain why Saturn has rings and Jupiter does not.
Why would gravity explain that? Completely unrelated.
Originally posted by another user
It is not even clear why we need a theory of gravity -- there is not a single mention in the Bible, and the patriotic founding fathers never referred to it.
Originally posted by another user
Finally, the mere name “Universal Theory of Gravity” or “Theory of Universal Gravity” (the secularists like to use confusing language) has a distinctly socialist ring to it. The core idea of “to each according to his weight, from each according to his mass” is communist.
The epitome of why I think this isn't supposed to be a serious article.