Originally posted by Epic
I think it ultimately comes down to a matter of burden of proof. While atheists may not be able to indisputably disprove the existence of God (or any deity or religion of your choosing), theists cannot indisputably prove the existence of God. I would say that, in this circumstance, the burden of proof would lie with the theists, because they are making unfounded statements and assumptions. I could claim that the Flying Spaghetti Monster is real - it's not the job of atheists to disprove me, but rather my job to prove my own statement. Pluralitas non est ponenda sine neccesitate.
The burden of proof is either on both sides, or on neither. Saying someone has to proof to you that their god exists is extremely arrogant. They should be free to do as they please. Like I said, belief in science is not "better" than a flying spaghetti monster (And using that example just makes you both look childish).
Originally posted by Cpt.Slow
Ahh another idiot on this forum........bet you got sucked into the LDS
No argument
Calls other person an idiot
Stay classy, Slow.