Originally posted by SLiiTH3R
aaaaaah but that is where you contradict yourself. That also means you cant use the word "started".
Allow me to elaborate. If you say the big bang started time that would mean that what ever equated to the big bang had to have come before it. IN that case if something comes before something its chronlological. Which is directly related to time. TIME.
x-->big bang--->time
x= something before the big bang implying that time was before the big bang. The big bang itself is flawed because as another person said, "With the big bang thing... It makes a start... But it have always been there..." implying time. He also said, "wait wait wait.... Time = Movement... The universe have always been there." I agree with this too, but not only is time = to movement but it is also equal to existance in my somewhat factual opinion.
Clearly the big bang THEORY is flawed, and heck it is a theory after all.
How old are you? The scientific ignorance here is absolutely astounding. Offence intended(this is the part where you go learn how science works, et cetera).
1) A beginning does not implicitly imply a before to said beginning due to the unique subject matter. You're just used to talking specifically within time, so your mind is having trouble comprehending it. That's normal. I'd be surprised if Stephen Hawking can really comprehend that after a life full of what we're used to. This is similar to the fallacy people commit when they say "everything I know has a creator and therefore so does X".
2) The big bang theory is flawed? Please submit your paper on its flaws and collect your Nobel prize.
3)
Just a theory, eh? You clearly don't know how theories work in science - they are "a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world, based on a body of facts that have been repeatedly confirmed through observation and experiment."