Originally posted by Pichu
Ok, first of all; anonymous isn't a single united group. Anyone can claim themselves to be part of this group. Just because one does bad, doesn't mean every single on of those who claim to be part of it is.
You can't say, Anonymous is doing good or bad activities. Anonymous is neutral. It's the people behind Anonymous and that claim to be part of it that we need to attack and decide whether or not they are good or bad.
For the most part, I find the group to advocate just things, there are however those who do go farther than the beliefs and I don't consider them to be Anonymous but more of Rouge users.
Even though you don't consider those people anonymous, they still kinda are. It's down to the individual person if they're anonymous or not. Obviously, that has it's downsides, but it has some major advantages as well. It's not easy to always portray and point when discussing anonymous because it can be seen as a group or an ethos.