No sorry, that's not how it works. I don't even have to watch the video to know what I'm getting into. It's clear that it's a very liberally bias source on the so called economy. Economics is not a class you can master in university. We are the economy, to believe that the economic is a mere circular flow like modern day Keynesian's paint it is just untrue. Just looking at the comments, the likes, I can already see what I'm going up against by even posting this. People posting things like:
You must login or register to view this content.
In response to the video, how do I feel about it? Well, good. I feel good knowing that if I went to school and got a good education, that I will be achieving a better salary. I know that I'm not entitled to a good salary, I have to go out and get one for myself. I can't go blaming the rich and the government for giving me a shitty job when I'm applying to work with a high school degree. What happens then? I go and blame the rich? "Boo rich people they're so greedy, they don't do anything booo".
Riddle me this. How many people do you think the world's richest people employ? Steve Jobs and Bill Gates for example. Let's forget about (even the so called "asshole" Donald Trump employs thousands at his hotels around the planet) and the other rich people who own successful companies. Google, Samsung, Sony, Amazon, I mean this list could go on forever.
Now, should we penalize them? Should we treat them like garbage? Should we hurl insults at them whenever we can? Logic would say no, but so many people do. They don't truly understand what a free market even means. They want to just tax and tax and tax. The whole reason these people got to where they are today is the exact thing the current governments around the planet are trying to get away from, and that's competition. Public this public that. Discourage the private sector where they are the most efficient. Mark up prices for gas, school and the whole load now that there's no more competition. Is this what we want? I noticed in the video that the so called dreaded "socialism" meant that all wealth was distributed "evenly". I almost fell out of my chair laughing at how people still believe that's what socialism is. Do you know what socialism is? It's not say, for example paying everyone $100,000 a year. It's paying everyone $10,000 a year. That's also "equal" but it's not the same principle. Not to mention rations, propaganda, no more rights, censorship etc.
More regulations mean less overall economic growth and less competition. I can't even begin to describe what true socialism is like, since I've seen what it can do to a great nation first hand. I guess you could have called me a liberal a few years ago. Then I took my free time and studied from Austrian economics. I realized that the Keynesian model is what has been tried, and continuously failed over the years around the planet. It hasn't worked and it will not work. I'd suggest that you take a look at Murray Rothbard, F.A. Hayek or Milton Friedman. Even people like Ronald Reagan were former liberals.
So back to the distribution problem. I do think it's a problem, but not a government problem. It's a people problem. And while I know that there are certain instances in which people are not able to work, and are not able to learn properly. But no one said they shouldn't be taken care of. I highly doubt that all of the unemployed people are not working because they are disabled. It's in the hands of the people with what they want to do with their lives. Saying that "distribution of wealth" is unfair is just an excuse. I know that if I flunk school and go on welfare it's not going to be the rich people's fault they're making millions. They deserve it. They don't deserve the flack they get.