1. Forums /
  2. Tech Boards /
  3. General Discussion /
  4. NO manograms for women under 40
Post: NO manograms for women under 40
11-16-2009, 11:20 PM #1
ꜛ  's Avatar
ꜛ  
Banned
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); Post your ideas
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
11-18-2009, 01:45 AM #11
ꜛ  's Avatar
ꜛ  
Banned
oh lol why? that wouldn't be right
11-18-2009, 04:51 PM #12
NanuGama's Avatar
NanuGama
YouTube.com/NanuGama
I think that you should start mamorgrams really early...didn't you hear about the girl that got breast cancer at 11! You need to prevent this at an early age. You dont know how old u'll be when you get it. it should be prevented.

The following user thanked NanuGama for this useful post:

ꜛ  
11-18-2009, 05:16 PM #13
ꜛ  's Avatar
ꜛ  
Banned
100% agreed numa
11-21-2009, 07:29 AM #14
H₂O's Avatar
H₂O
Samurai Poster
Manograms cost healthcare $5 billion a year and sometimes have misleading results that really isnt breast cancer. There should be an age restriction imo, but not as high as 40.
11-22-2009, 06:12 AM #15
Vegas's Avatar
Vegas
Viva Las?
Originally posted by blizzard94 View Post
This kind of makes no sense, women and men under 40 can get breast cancer (someone correct me if no one under 40s never had breast cancer). And isnt it being said now that at home breast checks are ineffective? You would think it would be encouraged now, especially since teenage girls are smoking even more than ever these days.
Men can get breast cancer?
11-22-2009, 08:21 AM #16
H₂O's Avatar
H₂O
Samurai Poster
Originally posted by Vegas View Post
Men can get breast cancer?


Yeah, a very small % though

It would bre pretty embarrassing to be a guy and have breast cancer
11-22-2009, 09:38 AM #17
Vegas's Avatar
Vegas
Viva Las?
Originally posted by O View Post
Yeah, a very small % though

It would bre pretty embarrassing to be a guy and have breast cancer
How exactly is that possible?

Copyright © 2026, NextGenUpdate.
All Rights Reserved.

Gray NextGenUpdate Logo