Originally posted by ALF
Asking him to prove that he is a pedophile is useless, he can just ask you to prove that he was one.
Maybe if you read through the posts then you will understand what I meant with my post.
He already asked us to prove that he was a pedophile, that's why I asked him to prove that he was not.
My point is, just because something can't be proved, that doesn't mean that it isn't / wasn't true.
It's like in a court, some guy may have murdered someone but there is no proof existing, and the murderer is found not guilty.