(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); Yesterday a popular journalist and lovable homosexual Milo Yiannopoulos was holding a debate/conference regarding "non safe space" issues. 15 minutes into the event BLM (Black Lives Matter) interrupted the event and threatened Milo with violence to stop his conference:


As you can see free speech is no longer (was it ever?) allowed by BLM and other left wing parties who support this degenerate behaviour. In the media the terrorists were described as "Protestors" and "Activists" but how can they be called that if they use terror to force people to shut their views down, this is fascism which is now a common occurrence in left wing entities. The hypocrisy among the liberals is that they are antifascist but their actions are making them fascists.

Image if your brain can that conservatives do this at a Senator Bernout rally, the media would be all over it as "Trump supports promote violence" as we have seen by the mass left wing propaganda machine media. The left only know one thing and that is irony.

Heres my say. I'm a white, London based, University student studying Culture and Conflict.

The Black Lives Matter movement acknowledges the crime problem BETWEEN BLACK people, but it refuses to locate that crime problem as a problem of black pathology. I tend to agree. America is CONSTITUTIONALLY racist. Vietnam a prominent example. Conscription for example (11% of Americas population was black, yet 12% of American soldiers on tour were black teenagers and 14% of soldiers killed in the Vietnam war were black. The idea of 'iluting the problem through war' Black people are not inherently more violent or more prone to crime than other groups, we have been taught this (the idea of the black savage), but black people are disproportionately poorer, more likely to be targeted by police and arrested, and more likely to attend poor or failing schools. All of these social indicators place a black individual at greater risk for being either a victim or a perpetrator of violent crime. To reduce violent crime, they must fight to change systems, rather than demonizing people.

Thats a short description. They aren't a terrorist group, to even label them as such reinforces the constitutional and institutional racism. They, like many other sub-cultures have SOME violent incidents, one like the one above. Every sub-culture is prone to violence if they want change, you can look at any sub-culture through history and find violent incidents.

A fantastic speaker on incidents like this is Dr. Umar Johnson. Youtube him. Speaks amazingly on black lives/pathology/psyche/stereotypes etc.

they a terrorist group didnt u see wat dey did 2 Ferguson and baltimore

Ferguson and Baltimore were direct responses to state violence, they fought violence with violence, thats not terror, thats democracy, according to practice.

so you study culture and conflict yet support rioting. you can tell your grading is on the low side of the spectrum

refer to earlier message. Thats democracy. The riot and looting was a PART of the protest, not all of it. You read too many news reports. The large majority of it was peaceful, but the narrative you're lead to believe is that the black citizens of Ferguson created chaos, thus, the brutal militarised police operation ensued, which legitimated state violence.

/pwned by autism.

Again, thats selective. You're saying that the live streams you watched covered the entirety of Ferguson. Try harder...