(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); Here's a new one. Don't expect it to win, but it did take a while
I had to resize to a smaller version so it would fit the sotw size. Might not see all the details.

You must login or register to view this content.

I give it Advanced 1/5 because half the noobs don't understand how it was put together so nicely

[quote='[-RX-] Rick;309361']Exams is up this week for me, as well as my last week. [/quote]

Gratz Hopefully we can do more gfx since the exams are done

Aye, I hope.:p

I'm very disappointed in you lord.
you ripped this with a PSD.
i would know, i have it.
You must login or register to view this content.

tisk tisk

nahhh, it cant be... no way
or is it true lord?
i doubt it... he probably just follow the tutorial...

there is no tut for it... and if there is, please show us lord.

LOL it's soooo obviouse it's not, look at lords box and look at that box. that box is attached on the left, lords isn't. that box doesn't have the details in the middle of the cube, Lord's does. you should pay more attention.

OMG, im not trying to be mean here, but taco, stfu, its a ****ing obvious layer rip, he had to of taking layer from the ****ing original psd to make the shading the same.
and he just prolly moved the top square up and added the ****ing thing in the middle, its so ****ing obvious, and the only ****ing reason you dont relies that is because your trying to defend your friend, so stfu and get out.


I bet you 1k$ that if we look at the PSD of his and compaired it to the original [which i have] that the llayers will be the same.

you cant just change colors and add little details and say you made it.

It's probably a tut because the pattern of the left side of the cube is a bit off to Lords.
It's possible that the outcomes of most tuts can be identical to the creator, especially if its a symbol-based tut.