(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); How does this look? What can I do better? Its my 4th sig I've made
You must login or register to view this content.

---------- Post added at 09:30 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:03 PM ----------

used:
You must login or register to view this content.

id suggest a C4D render and fading the text,:/

I don't like seeing c4d used in sigs. Just looks a little bad to me.

well everyone that is well known for there GFX on NGU use C4D's without c4d it plainold boring.

i dont use c4ds and i think mine turn out good

well for one dont make the focal so small (the guy with the flame thrower)

i like what you did with the colors but they dont match anything

You must login or register to view this content. is your best friend dont forget that

*hint* tutorials

youll get better

Ok, so I watched a smudge tutorial, but then realized, I dont have the smudge tool! :lol: so I made this loosely based on the tut, thoughts?
You must login or register to view this content.

alot better then your other one

im guessing those are C4Ds u put in there

strange choice of render haha

the text is better lemem try to find a tutorial and i want you to follow it and post back your finish project

You must login or register to view this content.

try that one and see what you can do

try to find your ''signature'' or your ''style''

alot of signatures dont need a C4D they just make certain types of them better for your eyes to look at

advance in what you do and keep on tutorials and they will take u far

Thanks! And those are some brushes I found, didn't use c4d. I'm making the new sig now.

ur sig looks sik

Disagree, you can make something much better without a CD4 like maybe your own?