(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); cnc
v1

You must login or register to view this content.

v2

You must login or register to view this content.

...I know the difference between a focal point and a render chief. been around signatures on and off for 6 years.

The way you put it, you made it seem like my "flow" was the focal point. Flow and focal point are too separate elements. No, I did not mean for my "flow" to be the "focal point". I wanted the whole signature to be the focal point. Just BAM.

and once again, i highly disagree with "if its going to be abstract dont use a render" ive seen tons of abstract work with renders. but who said the point of this signature was to be "abstract".

edit: also im not trying to come off as a prick, it just seems like thats what you were doing in your last post. not trying to stir up a pot of shit here.

Who said it was abstract? The tag. The focal point of the tag was a c4d, the major effects were c4d, the background and render are so undercontrasted that I can barely distinguish them... that fits the criteria of an abstract.

Also, the entire tag can't be a focal point. That leaves the eye with no single point to rest on, which destroys any kind of flow you have -which in this tag's case isn't great to begin with.

bad render choice, it seems lo qual while the c4d is of better quality. also the colors are very monotone and boring (gradients, curves, photofilters help alot)

nice work u good at abstract sigs