(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); Here Its Is Lol C+C Please
btw i made it all from scratch

P.S im new to sig making

You must login or register to view this content.

not sure if that's gonna be ok as it's verging on nudity. If a mod says it is then i'll come back and cnc

o sorry if it is, i thought is would be ok as nothings really showing

its just a pic spamed with brushes with text

i found the stock of the lady and rendered it
the background has no brushes, just an abstract C4D and yeah has text...well done

i positively hate everything about it. no offence but that signature is just sht. I HATE weed and i HATE people having nudity in signatures because those things ruin the art and people who respect GFX.

ok well colors dont match. no blending wat so ever. horrible text.......well done

Ok...... I would say go look at some tutorials to improve

wtf, are you serious... you know you have issues if you're scared to comment on a picture thats "verging on nudity" without a moderators concent, on a forum. I feel sorry for you.

anyway, it kinda sucks, you streched the picture (hold shift when using the transform tool to avoid this) the colours don't go, too big, text too big, text opacity is too low, font sucks, bad smudging around edges of stock image.

also, theres nothing wrong with weed or nudity, anyone who says so needs to put their bible down and leave their basement.

I agree on most aspects of this statement, but nudity does not ruin the "art and respect" of GFX. In fact if used correctly nudity in digital art can look very good.

But back to the point this sig is just bad,
I'm not bothered what you think of the comments left but this is the same as your past sigs.
You have been given advice by numerous people not to just stick things on and to take some time into your sigs. Its obvious your not listening so why bother making threads asking for Comments?