Post: SOTW 111: Voting
Options
03-27-2011, 12:47 AM
#1
Irish
Samurai Poster
You must login or register to view this content.
Vote for the signature that you think is the best!
This weeks theme was FREESTYLE!.[/COLOR]
Don't vote for yourself! Any voting for oneself will be disqualified
Rules:
Collaborations Allowed
Max Size: 500x250 = horizontal || 250x500 = vertical
No Ripping
No Premades
No Flaming
1 Entry
NO Animations
NO changing your entry
Good luck to all and may the best entry win!
Thanks to all you took part.
Last Weeks SOTW Winners:
Winner: You must login or register to view this content.
You must login or register to view this content.
Runner Up: You must login or register to view this content.
You must login or register to view this content.
[/B]
[/COLOR]
Vote for the signature that you think is the best!
This weeks theme was FREESTYLE!.[/COLOR]
Don't vote for yourself! Any voting for oneself will be disqualified
Rules:
Collaborations Allowed
Max Size: 500x250 = horizontal || 250x500 = vertical
No Ripping
No Premades
No Flaming
1 Entry
NO Animations
NO changing your entry
Good luck to all and may the best entry win!
Thanks to all you took part.
Last Weeks SOTW Winners:
Winner: You must login or register to view this content.
You must login or register to view this content.
Runner Up: You must login or register to view this content.
You must login or register to view this content.
[/B]
03-27-2011, 05:08 PM
#20
MATT23116
Guest
Originally posted by Dragone
My vote goes to The Overdose.
No offence to Matt, but it's sad how everyone's voting for a sig which contains ''animal sex'' , just to think it'll make them look 1337, while theres some sigs here which deserves it more to win.
And what happened to the "any fun entry won't be allowed" rule?
No offence to Matt, but it's sad how everyone's voting for a sig which contains ''animal sex'' , just to think it'll make them look 1337, while theres some sigs here which deserves it more to win.
And what happened to the "any fun entry won't be allowed" rule?
Originally posted by sfx.Designs
then why did you put it in the voting ? if its a joke entry ?
I know I may not be that good at graphic design, but I've never entered a SOTW contest before. I thought I'd give it a try, and I'm not going to make a boring entry, I tried to put my personality in it and make something that would make people laugh, as well as trying some effects and stuff with photoshop. I don't go around calling your signatures jokes, so please don't do it to mine. It's pretty offensive especially since I'm new to this.
The following user thanked MATT23116 for this useful post:
03-27-2011, 05:21 PM
#21
JDdesign
Pro Nub
Originally posted by MATT23116
I know I may not be that good at graphic design, but I've never entered a SOTW contest before. I thought I'd give it a try, and I'm not going to make a boring entry, I tried to put my personality in it and make something that would make people laugh, as well as trying some effects and stuff with photoshop. I don't go around calling your signatures jokes, so please don't do it to mine. It's pretty offensive especially since I'm new to this.
Calling your sig a joke is not being rude to you. You have 3 deer having sex and you called your sig "Animal Sex". For a first sig if this is your first one, you really didn't even try. You put 3 flares in front of their prives and a rdm c4d behind them.
The point of this sig was to get votes from laughter. I'll admit it's hilarious and i had a good laugh but when people take 2 or 3 hours to make a sig to compete and their blown out of the water by a sig that took 10 minutes it proves there is no point in devoting time to real art in this competition.
03-27-2011, 05:27 PM
#22
MATT23116
Guest
Originally posted by jdeezysqueezy
Calling your sig a joke is not being rude to you. You have 3 deer having sex and you called your sig "Animal Sex". For a first sig if this is your first one, you really didn't even try. You put 3 flares in front of their prives and a rdm c4d behind them.
The point of this sig was to get votes from laughter. I'll admit it's hilarious and i had a good laugh but when people take 2 or 3 hours to make a sig to compete and their blown out of the water by a sig that took 10 minutes it proves there is no point in devoting time to real art in this competition.
The point of this sig was to get votes from laughter. I'll admit it's hilarious and i had a good laugh but when people take 2 or 3 hours to make a sig to compete and their blown out of the water by a sig that took 10 minutes it proves there is no point in devoting time to real art in this competition.
Dude, I don't know what you want me to say, I tried to use some effects that I've seen through some threads in the graphic section, and I figured, if I'm going to make something bad anyway, might as well try to make it funny while I try. I know it isn't that good, but at least give me some benefit of the doubt since it's my first attempt at a signature. You're just being plain rude, and if you continue this, I'll be glad to take away 80+ rep from you.
03-27-2011, 05:31 PM
#23
JDdesign
Pro Nub
Originally posted by MATT23116
Dude, I don't know what you want me to say, I tried to use some effects that I've seen through some threads in the graphic section, and I figured, if I'm going to make something bad anyway, might as well try to make it funny while I try. I know it isn't that good, but at least give me some benefit of the doubt since it's my first attempt at a signature. You're just being plain rude, and if you continue this, I'll be glad to take away 80+ rep from you.
Scare me with - rep? I can speak my mind just like anyone on here dude. I just told you i thought it was hilarious so take that compliment and calm down lol.
03-27-2011, 06:08 PM
#24
MATT23116
Guest
Originally posted by jdeezysqueezy
Scare me with - rep? I can speak my mind just like anyone on here dude. I just told you i thought it was hilarious so take that compliment and calm down lol.
There's a difference between speaking your mind and being an asshole. You're being an asshole
The following user thanked MATT23116 for this useful post:
03-27-2011, 06:45 PM
#25
sharpy
.Jack Johnson.
SOTW is starting too become a bit of a joke to be honest, last week it was Charlie Sheen, which was a nice piece of graphics art, but was a bit of a joke, this week its animal sex, NGU really is falling apart :/
The following user thanked sharpy for this useful post:
03-27-2011, 06:47 PM
#26
Sir
Reeferlution
You must login or register to view this content.
Guys, Matt's sig is perfectly acceptable. Honestly, it is his first attempt at making a sig and he actually spent some time on it. I see lens flares, lighting, c4d's, text effects, and depth. There is no reason we shouldn't be allowed to add humor to our sigs, especially if we actually put some effort into them.
Guys, Matt's sig is perfectly acceptable. Honestly, it is his first attempt at making a sig and he actually spent some time on it. I see lens flares, lighting, c4d's, text effects, and depth. There is no reason we shouldn't be allowed to add humor to our sigs, especially if we actually put some effort into them.
The following user thanked Sir for this useful post:
03-27-2011, 07:14 PM
#27
conʀad
Taytor Gang over errythin
Originally posted by Wiseman
You must login or register to view this content.
Guys, Matt's sig is perfectly acceptable. Honestly, it is his first attempt at making a sig and he actually spent some time on it. I see lens flares, lighting, c4d's, text effects, and depth. There is no reason we shouldn't be allowed to add humor to our sigs, especially if we actually put some effort into them.
Guys, Matt's sig is perfectly acceptable. Honestly, it is his first attempt at making a sig and he actually spent some time on it. I see lens flares, lighting, c4d's, text effects, and depth. There is no reason we shouldn't be allowed to add humor to our sigs, especially if we actually put some effort into them.
Its more of a kick in the dick to those of us that spent hours on a serious signature. its not matts fault, it should have been not allowed to enter or people should actually vote on the quality of the signature. Rooney sig is dirty as **** for sure winner.
The following user thanked conʀad for this useful post:
03-27-2011, 07:25 PM
#28
+tA.Daisho
Crumpets and tea?
You know alls I hear in these threads week after week is whining and crying. You'd think i was sitting in a daycare centre. Matts entry isn't the best entered however it isn't a "joke" entry either. A joke entry would be something like a penis drawing in paint. You can tell matt spent some time doing this and the only joke I see is all the people bitching about it.
Maybe most of you babies shouldn't enter again if its too hard to show good sportsmanship in an meaningless competition on the internet.
Maybe most of you babies shouldn't enter again if its too hard to show good sportsmanship in an meaningless competition on the internet.
The following 6 users say thank you to +tA.Daisho for this useful post:
Copyright © 2026, NextGenUpdate.
All Rights Reserved.
