(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); I know they are made by EA, but what are the biggest differences?

You must login or register to view this content.

beat me to it

Way to go, bringing people's intelligence into question because they don't mind looking at a different story, different setting, different pace of gameplay, etc.

There's a difference between being "dumb", and appreciating what's out there, and giving everything a chance. And not judging things right away.

You're not going to make it through life if you don't accept things for what they are. MoH has been around since before the PS2, so I fail to see how the game is cheap, since it's had marginal success.

I have no doubt in my mind that DICE put long days and nights into developing this game, especially since it was announced quite a while ago.

Many games are built on the same engines, too. It doesn't mean they're cheap, or exactly the same, the graphics and mechanics are just similar. I could say the same thing about Call of Duty.

Until you develop a video game yourself that has had as much success as MoH and CoD, don't criticize trivial things. :rolleyes:

the story might be different, the people, enemies, setting, etc. all of that can be changed. but if it looks like a duck. plays like a duck. quacks like a duck. and a duck made it, what is it?

dice made this game way too much in comparrison to bfbc2. almost to the point where the casual gamer might not be able to tell the difference between the games. there are many examples out there that show this similar comparison.

here ill name 2.
cod4-cod5
nfs most wanted- nfs carbon

look and tell me that the only thing different is the story and skins. so yes, moh is going to be like bfbc2 but faster. but is that really worth the $60 dollers?

The point is you're not only calling the people who are buying Medal of Honor dumb, but you're basically calling the whole gaming industry dumb.

And is a video game really worth $60 to begin with?

You singled DICE out in your previous post for making a game similar to one they just released.

Afterwords, you said that Call of Duty and Need For Speed have done the same thing. The only reason I foresee is to cover your own ass and make it like you were just trying to forewarn people.

You were judging a game based on the fact that it was developed on the same engine, and if you have to do that, do it. But don't single DICE out, because EVERY developer is guilty of it.

You might as well go tell everyone else how much Call of Duty sucks, as well as Need For Speed, Gears of War, Brothers in Arms, Halo, Final Fantasy, Forza, The Legend of Zelda, Super Mario Brothers, Metal Gear, and every single game in the world.

I'm just saying, it's a pointless thing to complain about, because it's never going to stop. Just because the game might be the same as another doesn't mean they're all horrible. Halo, Call of Duty, and Need For Speed are prime examples of this.

They've been similar throughout the past 12 years, and yet people keep buying them. Doesn't that tell you something?

It doesn't make anybody dumb, it makes them loyal to the industry.

ok then. but i was not singling out dice of anything, alot of companies do have remakes and sequiels and such. it goes on and on. its just that, these games are two diferent games in general. sure yes, there will be some similarities. but shouldnt a company try to make a game unique. moh is not a bfbc sequil, in any shape or form.

so, how would you feel if, lets say, activison and iw produced bfbc2 online mechanics. would you expect a nearly exact repilca, or an online experience that has a few mechainics but is unique to that other company's game.

true i was a bit harsh, and yes im forwarning. its just that its possible that maby, just maby, this game will be an exact replica. you can say most video game companies do that, but anyone can tell that moh looks like bfbc2. dont they even use the same guns? these are things to keep in mind.

and yes, these games are not cheap. $50-60 easly, that doesnt include the special editions of the video game.

as much as you say whatever, this looks alot like bfbc2. and if you think a new skin is different, well...

What people don't seem to realize is that what your expectations are and what you'll actually get on the receiving end are two totally different things.

I'm just saying, you would think that people would come to appreciate things for what they are instead expecting something new every single time.

Developers are implementing new mechanics into games, all the time. Contrary to popular belief.

As for the "is any game really worth $60", that wasn't a question, it was I expressing my distaste for the insane way things are priced these days. x D

Calling MoH a replica of BFBC2 is pointless. Of course it'll look the same. Same engine, same look, same feel.

They definitely did much more than slap a new skin on things and change the setting and the story, pace of game-play, etc. I have no doubt about it.

There's a difference between copying a game's mechanics and building off of them, especially when it comes to multiplayer. No multiplayer is exactly the same, unless it's the exact same game re-released, which MoH isn't.

In simplest terms, game developers don't necessarily copy off of each other, they learn from other's mistakes and great ideas and build off of them.

BFBC2 is an ENTIRELY different game than MoH. In many different aspects. I'd go further into this, but I don't have the words at the moment. Lemme think about it. x D

If you think a new skin is the only difference, well...

Devs make every game unique, but people don't appreciate it like they should. Actually, they don't realize it like they should

not quiet. just putting out the word of this game. now you said not 2 games have the same online mechanics and such.

what was that part about sequils and such sharing the same concepts? contridiction :p

personal you can defend moh all day, its still very much like bfbc2. not you or a petiton is going to change that factor. :muck:

now real question is... have you played bfbc1 or 2? if so, then you can see the similarities. if not, then you wouldnt know anything about the similarities other than internet resources.

You're starting to get a little ticked, I can tell. Typical.

I've played every Battlefield game, ever since the first, at least three times. As well as Medal of Honor. I can see the similarities, but I'm also appreciative enough to sense the changes.

I fail to see where I contradicted myself, maybe you misunderstood my words? Exact words - "No multiplayer is exactly the same," and "same engine, same look, same feel", that's not saying they're exactly the same. They all have different mechanics, but when you develop the game on the SAME engine, of course the game is going to look and feel similar. :y:

I'm not defending Medal of Honor, by the way. I'm saying people are too bitchy and want everything new these days. ^ . ^ Can't appreciate what they have, don't want to do anything themselves, etc. I never said MoH wasn't very much like BFBC2. Entirely doesn't mean exactly, I meant it in the sense that it's unique in its own right.

You could criticize a video game all day, I really could care less. It's just when you say stupid shit like "you're dumb if you think you'll enjoy this". When you bitch about trivial things and don't see the big picture, you know?

You know what? I'm not going to waste your time, nor mine, explaining exactly what I meant about all of this.

My point is we're both wrong in our own ways, and we're both right in our own ways. Some of our opinions don't meet each other's criteria, but we know we're right. Let's leave it at that.<--- Yes, I know, that doesn't make any sense, but I can't describe it any other way.

Oh, now I see where you thought I contradicted myself.

Exactly means thoroughly the same in this, not sort of similar. <3