Post: M98b needs a buff!
01-13-2012, 03:38 AM #1
jerrmy12
At least I can fight
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); i mean, sniping is hard already, why have to pump two rounds to the heart? dice need to buff it, shouldlnt have to play hc for a osk, but i do get headshot on SOME campers...

no im not a noob.
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
01-14-2012, 07:57 AM #11
DCLXVI
Smoke weed.
Originally posted by Assassin. View Post
Its not just the M98B..you will get hitmarkers for days while playing in core.. they are only good in hardcore playlists.


Here's an idea, aim for the head, take two shots, or use a different weapon instead of whining about not getting one shot kills.
01-14-2012, 03:55 PM #12
I use the M98B quite often and agree it needs to be buffed. It is the weapon I have the most kills with and my longest HS with. (855m) It fires a .338 magnum round, that is more than enough to kill a person. So you can say we just need to aim for the head, but I already do and even I say it needs to be buffed. It should be a OHK to about 350m. If you don't believe any of my stats check my battlelog. You must login or register to view this content.
01-14-2012, 05:07 PM #13
jerrmy12
At least I can fight
Originally posted by DCLXVI View Post
If the snipers were one shot kill, they'd be abused just like they are in mw2/3. Do you really want to **** up bf3 to that extent?


they arent abused in mw3 or bo, trust me
and plus noobs cant account for bullet drop like me so i pwn der ass
n i get headshot aiming at chest


head 2.0X
abdomen 1.0x
limbs 0.9x
for the guy who said sum m about dmg multiplyers

---------- Post added at 12:07 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:02 PM ----------

Originally posted by casavult View Post
Agreed, if sniper rifles were one shot kills then it would just be abused and there would be no objective play, just Recon players running around trying to get YouTube footage.


trust me no
plus i nvr see qs'ers and qsing is totaly different plus to counter qsers just use a shotty, unlike mw3, plus there is no quicker aim, instant accuracy, but bullet speed, and only ohk in abdomen.
01-14-2012, 08:48 PM #14
DCLXVI
Smoke weed.
Originally posted by jerrmy12 View Post
they arent abused in mw3 or bo, trust me
and plus noobs cant account for bullet drop like me so i pwn der ass
n i get headshot aiming at chest


head 2.0X
abdomen 1.0x
limbs 0.9x
for the guy who said sum m about dmg multiplyers

---------- Post added at 12:07 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:02 PM ----------



trust me no
plus i nvr see qs'ers and qsing is totaly different plus to counter qsers just use a shotty, unlike mw3, plus there is no quicker aim, instant accuracy, but bullet speed, and only ohk in abdomen.


It WOULD be abused, you can't argue that. I'm not saying people would quickscope, but everyone would be sniping.
Minus everything being clientsided, battlefield 3 is great the way it is.
01-14-2012, 08:59 PM #15
jerrmy12
At least I can fight
Originally posted by DCLXVI View Post
It WOULD be abused, you can't argue that. I'm not saying people would quickscope, but everyone would be sniping.
Minus everything being clientsided, battlefield 3 is great the way it is.


no, it wud mke the pll who currently use recon not be useless
01-14-2012, 09:24 PM #16
Alt
Banned
BF3 isn't CoD.
I don't want it to end up like CoD too, perfect the way it is.
01-14-2012, 11:14 PM #17
DCLXVI
Smoke weed.
Originally posted by jerrmy12 View Post
no, it wud mke the pll who currently use recon not be useless


Your lack of intelligence makes your point invalid.
They are QUITE useful. I've gone 34-3 using the sv98.
01-15-2012, 02:22 AM #18
Assassin
Easter Egg!
Originally posted by DCLXVI View Post
Here's an idea, aim for the head, take two shots, or use a different weapon instead of whining about not getting one shot kills.


So in real life.. a bullet to the chest/heart would mean your dead but in battlefield you survive? kinda unrealistic in a game where its meant to be realistic..
Taking two shots.. not really ideal if they run for cover.. or have health packs and you take the second shot and get a hitmarker again.
And i`m not really bothered since i play in hardcore.. just sayin snipers are garbage in the normal playlists.
01-15-2012, 11:08 AM #19
DCLXVI
Smoke weed.
Originally posted by Assassin. View Post
So in real life.. a bullet to the chest/heart would mean your dead but in battlefield you survive? kinda unrealistic in a game where its meant to be realistic..
Taking two shots.. not really ideal if they run for cover.. or have health packs and you take the second shot and get a hitmarker again.
And i`m not really bothered since i play in hardcore.. just sayin snipers are garbage in the normal playlists.


This is a GAME, not real life. If it were actually realistic, it'd be extremely unfair.

Copyright © 2026, NextGenUpdate.
All Rights Reserved.

Gray NextGenUpdate Logo