(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); There is most likely going to be a large DLC coming out sometime in the future. BF2 had 4 DLCs and BC2 had Vietnam. What do you want BF3's version of that to be?

I was talking about it in the sb and came up with some options.

The Civil War, lol.

World War I.

World War II.

Something Cold War-esque, like Black Ops.

Present time, just a huge expansion with maps and guns.

Future, something like BF2142.

Any thoughts/ideas/comments? Discuss.

Bomb war :lol:
Kamikazee's , Stealth bombers n shit :p

A clean map...no hiding spots...only like some shooter graves...nothing else...no tanks...no helis...BUT jets have to be there... :dance:

It could be the Pacific campaign if WWII. It could have kamikaze planes. :fyea:

a flat land map, the map is medium and its just flat, just like 2 trees on the full map

I guess something that's going on now like just more maps vehicles and guns
Or something like future warfare stuff like that might be cool

An ocean map with a few islands but mainly sea/air battles.

I'm thinkin an Air Superiority like they had in 1943, but with jets. Bring back Dragon Valley and Operation Clean Sweep. Also, add in something like what Fl@sh said. Use Rhib Boats and add in some "armored" boats that have more than one turret. 4 jets for each side on that map, 2 scout choppers and 1 attack chopper. (If you can't tell by now with the maps listed and my map idea, i LOVE flying)

There are a lot of things DICE could do with DLC for this game, but I don't think they'll take the Civil War, World War I, or World War II paths. The Civil War would be difficult to make enjoyable granted the way battle was fought back in those days, and would be tricky to implement correctly. Adding any past war to the game would seem somewhat silly as a DLC, because it would provide less weapons, vehicles, etc., granted they weren't present during those times. It would seem more like a downgrade than an upgrade.

Whatever DICE decides to do, they're going to have to do a hell of a good job with it granted the current landscape of the FPS genre. Present time shooters have been done, we've seen those with Medal of Honor. Future shooters have been done, also, with the likes of the Modern Warfare titles. The only path that hasn't recently been trekked on would be very old wars [i.e. the Civil War (which I don't think they'll do for reasons above)] and future warfare. Future warfare seems to be more so the direction of Call of Duty, though, not Battlefield. Over the years the Call of Duty franchise has strayed from their realism factor, and has focused more on creating a really fast-paced, crazy experience, while Battlefield has stuck to its roots in trying to be realistic.

Really not sure what DICE will do. All the options available to them don't really seem feasible. They've certainly got a challenge ahead of them.

A big field with absolutely nothing in it, no air or land support, literally nowhere to hide