(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); You can view the page at You must login or register to view this content.

you mean EA right?

Hey,
Yeah I do, I was reading about THQ in another article and my brain must have still been thinking about it, thank you for the quick fix, I edited it.

Lets hope it gets better then the latest part cuz it was horrible, a cheap copy of cod ( even some missions got the same the name like in cod...)

I think I am one of the few who loved the previous Medal of Honor. Campaign was too linear agreed, but it had to be so that Tier 1 was doable in 1 life. Multiplayer was great though, the point streak system works wel once you understand it.

From that 7 minutes though, this will likely be my shooter of the year. The beginning, the breach and the artillery strike looked amazing.

I'd have to agree with you on this.
I wouldn't say I'm too much of a trophy whore (anymore), but I absolutely hate FPS' now, but when I played Medal of Honor because my brother had it laying down, I couldn't stop playing until I got to 100%.

The multiplayer was acceptable, with medium-to-large maps, a lot of camping and sniping, but it was still enjoyable to run 'n' gun.

I also do agree with the campaign, it was a great campaign with an awesome story, and even though it was short, it was still worth my time playing a few times, even on hard (which wasn't too bad).

As for Tier 1, it was different and I liked it. It challenged me and caused me to become frustrated a few times but when you beat the time it felt really good and rewarding, it was also rewarding for the gold trophy when you break all times at the end.