Originally posted by Ace
What do you think?
Consoles today struggle to run BF3. Ik that almost every time I play Gulf of Oman I freeze because of its size and Armored Kill will be no different. I think its a very bad Idea for EA to be releasing BF4 so fast. They still have other options such as 2143 (basically like battlefield 1943 where they redid part of 1942 for consoles but they redo the entire 2142 game for consoles) or BC3. Look at how long bf3 is going to last after the last DLC, End Game. They will have a total of 5 DLC's and over 30 maps (Correct me if I'm wrong) and so many weapons and vehicles to use and master. They have already proven they can beat CoD, but I believe they are releasing so early for 2 reasons.
1. This is the first major BF game to have a campaign and they want to satisfy everyone's hunger for an end to the story. (The major BF games being 1942 and expansions, Vietnam (PC), BF2 and expansions, 2142, and BF3. The console ports of BF like 1943 and BC series were not as huge as the other BF games)
2. B.O.2 is being released and they are worried CoD will regain its popularity.
EDIT: Talked to a friend on PSN and idk where he heard it so its just a rumor but the PS4 may possibly be showcased at E3 in 2013.