(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); Saw this image in Reddit and solved one of my most asked questions (by myself).

You must login or register to view this content.

This is EXACTLY why BF4 should be available to consoles when the next gen consoles come out.

No offense, but that has to be one of the dumbest things i have read on here... Again, scroll up and read my explanation... MAG, graphically, is an eyesore, and because of this, it runs at a higher frame rate... so zipper was able to put 256 people on one map because of a restriction on their graphical performance... And once again, Battlefield is beautifully rendered, running at a higher graphical rate than MAG... because of this, if they put 256 people on 1 map, it would be like playing an online game with 56K dialup... the frame rate would lag badly.

i love that show lol

Anybody with half a brain knew this already :p

impossible:dumb:

And...What show would that be exactly ?

---------- Post added at 04:44 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:43 PM ----------



Since the beta isn't until the end of 2013 it might be for ps4 and xbox 720 you never know but I doubt it

I'd believe it. I'd rather have the 24 players and not sacrifice performance and graphics.

And to people who complain about PC having more players, better performance and graphics... just go out and get a decent PC and video card. Problem solved. But other than that nice post OP :y:

thev problem what u guys dont see if you compaire the graphics from MAG and bf3 in combination with servers is that you dont even need 256 in bf3 you only need 32 or 64 and not 256 so in my eyes i think it MUST be possible to setup servers that have 32 or 64 ppl instead of 24 we dont need the same as MAG then you guys been in right that the frames droped down much but on 32 with the graphics of bf3 it will work
it gives other games that dont look like crap and handle 32 ppl online

I like this game alot... but the maps are too big for 24 player.