Originally posted by Godfather
MW2 wins this. I play MW2 but i am not a big fan, i have played BBC2 demo and my solution is: BBc2 is that kind of game that you get headaches and get annoyed. You have to earn gazillion points to get a sniper rifle that is not a Bolt-Action. The sniper you begin with this Bolt-Action rifle that does not kill in one shot. You need 32 kills with that crappy bolt action rifle that doesn't kill in one shot to get a decent sniper. The game kinda looks like Playmo or Team Fortress or something as much childish. MW2 is simply better.
Really going to have to disagree with most of this.
1. The 1st Sniper Rifle is a one shot kill with a headshot. Also, BFBC2 has a "perk" type system kind of like MW2 and I believe one of them is very similar to stopper power which could create easier one shot kills. MW2 sniper rifles are basically the same way and a lot of snipers prefer bolt-action sniper rifles compared to a "aim and spray" sniper rifle so I dont really understand your point.
2. In reference of your TF2 comment...I cant say that BFBC2 is 100% realistic(because it is still a videogame) but it is a lot more realistic than MW2. MW2 with the commando, killstreaks, painkiller, martydom, last stand, and being able to reload akimbo weapons make MW2 unrealistic and a campers fest.
The main problem I see with BFBC2 is that I am not sure if XBOX/PS3 players are smart enough to play it correctly. You cannot play BFBC2 like MW2 and be effective. MW2 has a bunch of team based games but you can still play them as an individual and be very successful. BFBC2 requires in most game types to play in a squad and work as a unit to complete a set objective.