Originally posted by chargers705
MAG was alright, but the graphics SUCKED and it wasn't fun to play unless you had like a full squad.
Graphics aren't the most important thing, and they weren't even that bad.
I don't see why people bitch about the graphics in a game when, for one thing, it's better than anything they could develop. For another thing, we've come far in the past 30+ years when it comes to graphics and gameplay alike, and it's just sad when people don't appreciate what they're getting. If I were the devs, I'd go back to 8-bit just to piss you guys the **** off. =D
---------- Post added at 10:10 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:09 PM ----------
Originally posted by snowaura1337
i though MAG2 was SOCOM4 ? lol M.A.G failed i dont see why i would buy MAG2 from a game dev. that only care about ****ing casual gamers
Your ignorance amuses me. Please continue. I quite enjoy laughing.
I guess Call of Duty is for hardcore gamers, right?
On topic: MAG was a decent game, but I haven't cared to play it much. But, hey, it's only $20, and considering that it's not a bad game at all.