Post: COD5 is old fighting really?..
06-30-2008, 09:39 PM #1
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); I dont understand, why have the makers of all the call of duty's (Infinity Ward): brought out a modern warfare game and now reverting back to world war II. out of all of the COD games only COD4 & COD2 have won awards, COD4 winning 3 and COD2 winning 1. so infinity Ward as gained alot of credit by bringing out a modern game so why go back!

what do you all think? should infinty ward brough out a new modern warfare game, or have they made the right choice with world war II?

please reply cheers
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
09-03-2008, 08:56 PM #20
They went back to WWII because they had not made a game based in the pacific. If they went more futuristic it would just be dumb, because they wouldn't be working with real feasible weapons, they would just be guessing.
09-04-2008, 01:12 PM #21
I say just wait on it coming out, who knows it could be the best COD yet, and I'm hoping so, I'll still be getting it no matter what bad rep it's getting thus far.
09-04-2008, 05:18 PM #22
laTex
WutDaFish?
yea i'm also gonna buy it for shure man Happy
09-06-2008, 04:26 PM #23
They should have kept it modern, but I am curious to see what the multilayer is going to be like. Heck we might all be blown away.

Copyright © 2026, NextGenUpdate.
All Rights Reserved.

Gray NextGenUpdate Logo