(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); Here's A Video Reference For You:



My Version:

    

CoolText()

{

self.display FadeOverTime( 0.75 ); self.display.color = ( 1, 0, 0 ); wait .75;

self.display FadeOverTime( 0.75 ); self.display.color = ( 0, 1, 0 ); wait .75;

self.display FadeOverTime( 0.75 ); self.display.color = ( 0, 0, 1 ); wait .75; 

self.display FadeOverTime( 0.75 ); self.display.color = ( 1, 0, 1 ); wait .75;

self.display FadeOverTime( 0.75 ); self.display.color = ( 0, 1, 1 ); wait .75; 

self.display FadeOverTime( 0.75 ); self.display.color = ( 1, 1, 0 ); wait .75; 

self thread CoolText();

}

TheFallen's Shorter Version:

Thread From Menu, Or Anywhere Else

    

self thread doFlash(self.display);

    

doFlash(elem)

{

    r=randomint(255);

    g=randomint(255);

    b=randomint(255);

    for(;

        {

            elem FadeOverTime( 0.75 );

            elem.color=(r,g,b);

            wait .75;

        }

}

ReScript's Version:

    

colorFade( color1, color2, freq ){    self.flashing = true;    memo = 0;    while( self.flashing = true )    {        self fadeOverTime( freq );        if ( memo = 0 ){            self.color = color1;            memo = 1;        }        if ( memo = 1 ){            self.color = color2;            memo = 0;        }        wait freq;    }}

//starting the flashelement colorFade( (1, 0, 0), (0, 1, 0), 1 );

//ending the flashelement.flashing = false;  

NOTE: CHANGE THE "self.display" TO WHATEVER YOUR TEXT CODE IS (Ex: self.MenuText)

Taskin =D, a break; and a waittill would sort it perfect

did i quote you or ITheFallenI :confused: ?

So you want a script that fades in and out of one color the whole time and can't be stopped? And if your talking about reScript's code; it will syntax if you run it.

Just thought I would add on what I said above also.
The memo variable is there to keep track at what colour is being used, taking it away would not work, unless you had something like this:

    



colorFade( color1, color2, freq ){        self.flashing = true;        memo = 0;        while( self.flashing = true )        {                self fadeOverTime( freq );                      self.color = color1;        self fadeOverTime( freq );                        self.color = color2;         wait freq;        }}

That would have the same effect yes but as many people have found out getting the efficient CPU using scripts is vital -
The way I set out was to make sure the (patch, game or ps3) was keeping up to date with the script, very important for high string usage patches also.

Any here's the fix...

    



colorFade( color1, color2, freq ){        self.flashing = true;        memo = 0;     while( 1 )    {                self fadeOverTime( freq );                if ( memo = 0 ){                        self.color = color1;                        memo = 1;                }                if ( memo = 1 ){                        self.color = color2;                        memo = 0;                }        if ( !self.flashing ){            break;        }        wait freq;    }}

Here. This is basically what you were doing.

    trollCopter()

{

	variable = 1;

	while( 1 )

	{

		if( variable == 1 ) //obviously it's equal to one since you set it to one above

		{

			variable = 0;

		}

		if( variable == 0 ) //it's obviously going to be zero, since you set it to zero above

		{

			variable = 1; //z0mg, let's repeat this useless process

		}

		wait .130910;

	}

}

Now, can you please explain to me how that's more efficient than this.

    doFlash()

{

	self endon( "flashEnd" );

	while( 1 )

	{

		self fadeOverTime( .7 );

		self.color = ( randomFloat( 1 ), randomFloat( 1 ), randomFloat( 1 ) );

		wait .75;

        }

} 

Also, your 'fix' still has syntax errors...

Obviously you did not read my last post carefully.

:derp::derp::derp::derp::derp::derp::derp::derp::derp::derp::derp::derp::derp::derp::derp:

I guess I'll end this argument, considering I can't read. If you have anything more to say, please PM me, instead of ruining the thread.

Ruining the thread?
I'm not the one posting 15 of the same emotions in a line.

So? Your the one who's keeping this dumb argument going on. I don't even care about what you have to say. All I said was that two of the versions posted in the OP were flawed, which they were, but you had to make it into something more.

Your exactly the reason why I haven't bothered posting on this forum in over a year.