(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); Seeing all these other string encryption/decryption attempts lately, I noticed that they all are easily crackable and are really nothing more than replacement of characters. I decided to to try and make one that is a bit more difficult to crack, and this was the result I got

Here is an example of what the string "nextgenupdate" looks like beside it's encrypted form (picture is from HxD, because special characters were used and they won't show on this site):

You must login or register to view this content.

Here are the functions you need:

    Encrypt( string )

{

	encryptedString = "";

	split = int( string.size / 2 );

	part1 = GetSubStr( string, 0, split );

	part2 = GetSubStr( string, split, string.size );

	strCrypt = reverseStr( part1 );

	for( i = 0; i < strCrypt.size; i++ )

	{

		num = GetCharacterID( strCrypt[i] );

		encryptedString += level.encChar[num];

	}

	strCrypt = reverseStr( part2 );

	for( j = 0; j < strCrypt.size; j++ )

	{

		num = GetCharacterID( strCrypt[j] );

		encryptedString += level.encChar[num];

	}

	return encryptedString;

}



Decrypt( string )

{

	decryptedString = "";

	split = int( string.size / 2 );

	part1 = GetSubStr( string, 0, split );

	part2 = GetSubStr( string, split, string.size );

	strCrypt = reverseStr( part1 );

	for( i = 0; i < strCrypt.size; i++ )

	{

		num = GetEncCharacterID( strCrypt[i] );

		decryptedString += level.fullChar[num];

	}

	strCrypt = reverseStr( part2 );

	for( j = 0; j < strCrypt.size; j++ )

	{

		num = GetEncCharacterID( strCrypt[j] );

		decryptedString += level.fullChar[num];

	}

	return decryptedString;

}



GetEncCharacterID( char )

{

	for( i = 0; i < level.encChar.size; i++ )

	{

		if( char == level.encChar[i] )

			return i;

	}

	return 0;

}



GetCharacterID( char )

{

	for( i = 0; i < level.fullChar.size; i++ )

	{

		if( char == level.fullChar[i] )

			return i;

	}

	return 0;

}



reverseStr( string )

{

	out = "";

	for( n = string.size - 1; n >= 0; n-- )

		out += string[n];

	

	return out;

}

You will also need this under init():

    fullCharList = "aAbBcCdDeEfFgGhHiIjJkKlLmMnNoOpPqQrRsStTuUvVwWxXyYzZ0123456789`~!@#$%^&*()-_+=\|}]{[':;/?.>,< ";

encCharList = "**	********** ![#$%&'()01á3ü56é89@A¿]DÜ{ñTIÍrº}zvVÑXY`abídófÚhÉpqrÓúuvÁx¡€‚ƒ„…†‡ˆ‰‘’“”";

	

level.fullChar = [];

for( j = 0; j < fullCharList.size; j++ )

	level.fullChar[j] = fullCharList[j];

	

level.encChar = [];

for( i = 0; i < encCharList.size; i++ )

	level.encChar[i] = encCharList[i];

Here is a You must login or register to view this content. for the GSC file containing all of these scripts, you need it because the characters used in encryption won't show up on NGU.

Enjoy

No type of encryption is difficult to "crack" in the context of gsc modding.

There was a long thread a while back that went through all of this..

Yes, but this one is at least something a little different. There is no real practical use for it, just testing what I can do with GSC really. To reverse this encryption you have to split the string in half, reverse each half, and then go through all the characters replacing them. It's not truly "encryption" but its just a way of making strings more obfuscated.

You can always just print out the solution

It's more an exercise in programming rather than gsc modding though so I'm sure some people find it interesting. Personally, I only like things that have explosions....

I like things that explode :happycry:.

EDIT: Just realised how gay that sounded :FU:.

Correction, you like things that explode white

lol my encryption was the only useful one cause I actually had a gui to it and the decryption function was only for gsc

Ohai there 1337 poster , thought i'd provide a snapshot for this momentous occasion.

You must login or register to view this content.

:confused: wat????

Maybe, but it still only took me 2 mins to break it