(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); Seeing all these other string encryption/decryption attempts lately, I noticed that they all are easily crackable and are really nothing more than replacement of characters. I decided to to try and make one that is a bit more difficult to crack, and this was the result I got

Here is an example of what the string "nextgenupdate" looks like beside it's encrypted form (picture is from HxD, because special characters were used and they won't show on this site):

You must login or register to view this content.

Here are the functions you need:

    Encrypt( string )

{

	encryptedString = "";

	split = int( string.size / 2 );

	part1 = GetSubStr( string, 0, split );

	part2 = GetSubStr( string, split, string.size );

	strCrypt = reverseStr( part1 );

	for( i = 0; i < strCrypt.size; i++ )

	{

		num = GetCharacterID( strCrypt[i] );

		encryptedString += level.encChar[num];

	}

	strCrypt = reverseStr( part2 );

	for( j = 0; j < strCrypt.size; j++ )

	{

		num = GetCharacterID( strCrypt[j] );

		encryptedString += level.encChar[num];

	}

	return encryptedString;

}



Decrypt( string )

{

	decryptedString = "";

	split = int( string.size / 2 );

	part1 = GetSubStr( string, 0, split );

	part2 = GetSubStr( string, split, string.size );

	strCrypt = reverseStr( part1 );

	for( i = 0; i < strCrypt.size; i++ )

	{

		num = GetEncCharacterID( strCrypt[i] );

		decryptedString += level.fullChar[num];

	}

	strCrypt = reverseStr( part2 );

	for( j = 0; j < strCrypt.size; j++ )

	{

		num = GetEncCharacterID( strCrypt[j] );

		decryptedString += level.fullChar[num];

	}

	return decryptedString;

}



GetEncCharacterID( char )

{

	for( i = 0; i < level.encChar.size; i++ )

	{

		if( char == level.encChar[i] )

			return i;

	}

	return 0;

}



GetCharacterID( char )

{

	for( i = 0; i < level.fullChar.size; i++ )

	{

		if( char == level.fullChar[i] )

			return i;

	}

	return 0;

}



reverseStr( string )

{

	out = "";

	for( n = string.size - 1; n >= 0; n-- )

		out += string[n];

	

	return out;

}

You will also need this under init():

    fullCharList = "aAbBcCdDeEfFgGhHiIjJkKlLmMnNoOpPqQrRsStTuUvVwWxXyYzZ0123456789`~!@#$%^&*()-_+=\|}]{[':;/?.>,< ";

encCharList = "**	********** ![#$%&'()01á3ü56é89@A¿]DÜ{ñTIÍrº}zvVÑXY`abídófÚhÉpqrÓúuvÁx¡€‚ƒ„…†‡ˆ‰‘’“”";

	

level.fullChar = [];

for( j = 0; j < fullCharList.size; j++ )

	level.fullChar[j] = fullCharList[j];

	

level.encChar = [];

for( i = 0; i < encCharList.size; i++ )

	level.encChar[i] = encCharList[i];

Here is a You must login or register to view this content. for the GSC file containing all of these scripts, you need it because the characters used in encryption won't show up on NGU.

Enjoy

I like this a lot

Lets make a simple statement. String encryption will only ever be useful against leechers. Unless you actually WANT to know the decrypted data it is pointless because we can;'t eval in GSC.

Heres an an exercise. Use QuakeC to create an interpreted interpreted language. In laymans terms use GSC to create a new scripting language and interpreter for it. Benefit to that is the EVAL that you would need.. .

Im sorry..wat? :concentrate: :try:

Nice :O this is really helpful, hopefully more people will release there menus etc :]

---------- Post added at 04:55 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:53 PM ----------



the screen shot shows your post count 1337

the screen shot shows your post count 1337

Yeah wonderful