Originally posted by RoyalShady
I completly agree with you guys ! this is the truth .
I think both companies offer great things. IW games are actually more fun in my opinion. They are also more frustrating obviously. IW games have things like getting triples and multikills from Preds, AC130s, Gunners, and in 3arc games killstreaks were fun but not quite as much fun.
3arc shines in not being nearly as noob friendly as IW games usually are. Their games are fun as well. They have nice innovative ideas and their games change from game to game a lot more than IW games.
Black Ops 2 seems to be a combo of what both companies do well. IW style graphics, guns and fun mixed with 3arc style maps, customization, audio settings and a mixture of all the killstreaks. 3arc also has Zombies which is probably half of their popularity right there. Both companies are good in their own ways. IW games are faster paced and more clusterfucks which is good and bad. 3arc games are more polished and professional. So it's really a debatable argument. Not worth choosing sides though. I enjoyed BO more than MW3 but I had more fun in MW3 than BO if that makes sense lol.