Post: All in favor of a CoD4/MW2 remake?
03-13-2013, 10:57 PM #1
Atascocita
Do a barrel roll!
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); Hey guys, I was recently thinking about how bad Black Ops 2 is in comparison to how good CoD 4 and MW2 were... that is, before the hacking began. Right now, the only thing that BO2 has going for itself is that it has zombies. Zombies are fun and all, but the multiplayer is just terrible. The maps are poorly constructed and the hit detection is even worse. Even when you play zombies there is bad hit detection.. and that's a problem, haha.

IF they were to remake a previous CoD video game, such as CoD 4 and MW2, I believe that all they would need to do is simply get rid of the hacks and glitches. The maps were AMAZING, just flat out: Amazing.

CONS of previous CoDs:

-Hacks/Glitches
-Grenade Launchers

PROS of previous CoDs:

-Everything else





I might've not made the best argument, but I felt like I had to get this out there. :y:
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

The following 11 users say thank you to Atascocita for this useful post:

-O-Z-Z-A-8-8-, a7meDz, Contributed, Dog88Christian, RigorBro, thejamdude, TrytoYOLO, Vanz, xkoeckiiej, xKtF, ZeroFateHD

The following 3 users groaned at Atascocita for this awful post:

Eminem., Pulsar877, Richtofen
03-14-2013, 01:23 AM #11
Porter_Justice
Cake is a lie
Another CoD4 and even MW2 appreciation thread huh. I'd imagine most would just complain about them rehashing the same game and charging us $60.

COD as a series is stale not solely because previous games were better. It's mostly since we've played essentially the same game for 6 years.

Originally posted by Octavia View Post
How about a Call of Duty 1 remake?
Because

-No perks
-No regenerating health
-No killstreaks
-No rank-up system
-Fa-nominal maps
-Mod tools
-Just flat out better


Yeah if it's $20 on PC or a PSN/XBL downloadable game. They'd barely make any money with a game that plain...

The following 2 users say thank you to Porter_Justice for this useful post:

-O-Z-Z-A-8-8-, Swifter
03-14-2013, 01:37 AM #12
xMuz
Bounty hunter
Mw2 HD Remake n Ps4 :love:
03-14-2013, 01:43 AM #13
Contributed
I defeated!
This is pretty much like my thread so I support it.

The following user thanked Contributed for this useful post:

Atascocita
03-14-2013, 01:45 AM #14
Remake cod4!!!
03-14-2013, 01:59 AM #15
Atascocita
Do a barrel roll!
So many supporters :happyguy:
03-14-2013, 02:10 AM #16
Contributed
I defeated!
Originally posted by cbubel View Post
So many supporters :happyguy:


Because this is the greatest thread ever.
03-14-2013, 02:16 AM #17
Dman93
Crawl to your cross
[quote=[Gk!A]BOOM;5114793]We're dealing with video game hipsters here...[/quote]

More like nostalgic fans.

The following user thanked Dman93 for this useful post:

ResistTheSun
03-14-2013, 02:26 AM #18
Contributed
I defeated!
Here you go.


Host sucks on Black Ops 2- I think it just goes to show who the superior CoD makers are. It's amazing that taking 3 steps back had a much more exciting, free running game where if you died, you didn't feel so cheated - that you lost the gunfight fairly..

Modern Warfare 2

-Better maps
-Better flow
-Better hit detection
-Good story
-Well balanced
-Just a better game
-Pro Circuit was more competitive back then as to now

Black Ops 2

-Almost unplayable with lag
-Horrible hit detection
-Not great maps (New Maps are terrible)
-Biggest Connection Game Made
-Not a map in BO2 where you can cross the map without hitting a choke point.
-League play is cool
-Love how they took zombies to whole another level
-The whole objective thing is cool
-A lot of variety of guns you can use in competitive without having an unfair advantage.
-Ps3 frozed about 20 times total.


Fluidity: MW2
Weapons: MW2
Maps: MW2
Minigame: BOII (Zombies)
Playability: Mw2

Overall Mw2 is a way better game then BO II.


Originally posted by OVOXO
Stopped reading at MW2 well balanced.

Seriously? Blops2 has already had a couple of patches regarding balance issues; it took months for MW2 to even fix akimbo 1887s. Noob toobs are still not fixed after 3 years.

And "just a better game" as an argument?

Personally, I just think that people believe that MW2 is a better game because of the new stuff it brought to the MP metagame. Pro perks, more game modes, and just a general improvement in graphics and gameplay from the previous CoDs(WaW and MW1) just appealed to a large audience. Due to aging consoles, there really isn't that large of an improvement between each of the CoDs now, therefore making each seem more boring. Hopefully that will change with the next gen consoles though.


Oh REALLY? Did Mw2 ever freeze for you like BO II did? Did Mw2 have a bad as host change as BO II where the game just completely drops everytime a host changes. I didn't think so. Did Mw2 ever make you pay for shitty map packs and gay camos? Also, targeting recticles? Who the freak uses a targeting recticle lmao. BO II you seem to run into a choking point every corner you turn. Mw2 had much MORE balanced maps then BO II. Also, the shotguns and snipers are completely op'ed. League play noobs camp down in the 3rd hardpoint spot in HJ with Kap 40's and shotguns lol. When I mean balanced I mean that the shotguns couldn't kill you from a mile away and the snipers weren't so op'ed. Shock Charges are a also pretty stupid along with sensor grenades. Along with that, the hit detection is STRAIGHT GARBAGE. If I lost a gun fight in mw2, I can actually say I got killed FAIRLY. BO II is such an host dominance game compared to Mw2. If a whole team has full green bars while the other team has 3 yellow bars you are very likely to lose. (Until the green bars don't have common sense) If you know anything about Mw2 or did competitive you would know host did not mean shit as compared to BO II. Please don't say I'm completely bias because in my thread it clearly states pros about BO II(If you're going to make a counter-point argument on this comment)

The following user thanked Contributed for this useful post:

Atascocita

The following user groaned Contributed for this awful post:

Porter_Justice
03-14-2013, 05:38 AM #19
Porter_Justice
Cake is a lie
Originally posted by Contributed View Post
Here you go.


Host sucks on Black Ops 2- I think it just goes to show who the superior CoD makers are. It's amazing that taking 3 steps back had a much more exciting, free running game where if you died, you didn't feel so cheated - that you lost the gunfight fairly..

Modern Warfare 2

-Better maps
-Better flow
-Better hit detection
-Good story
-Well balanced
-Just a better game
-Pro Circuit was more competitive back then as to now

Black Ops 2

-Almost unplayable with lag
-Horrible hit detection
-Not great maps (New Maps are terrible)
-Biggest Connection Game Made
-Not a map in BO2 where you can cross the map without hitting a choke point.
-League play is cool
-Love how they took zombies to whole another level
-The whole objective thing is cool
-A lot of variety of guns you can use in competitive without having an unfair advantage.
-Ps3 frozed about 20 times total.


Fluidity: MW2
Weapons: MW2
Maps: MW2
Minigame: BOII (Zombies)
Playability: Mw2

Overall Mw2 is a way better game then BO II.




Oh REALLY? Did Mw2 ever freeze for you like BO II did? Did Mw2 have a bad as host change as BO II where the game just completely drops everytime a host changes. I didn't think so. Did Mw2 ever make you pay for shitty map packs and gay camos? Also, targeting recticles? Who the freak uses a targeting recticle lmao. BO II you seem to run into a choking point every corner you turn. Mw2 had much MORE balanced maps then BO II. Also, the shotguns and snipers are completely op'ed. League play noobs camp down in the 3rd hardpoint spot in HJ with Kap 40's and shotguns lol. When I mean balanced I mean that the shotguns couldn't kill you from a mile away and the snipers weren't so op'ed. Shock Charges are a also pretty stupid along with sensor grenades. Along with that, the hit detection is STRAIGHT GARBAGE. If I lost a gun fight in mw2, I can actually say I got killed FAIRLY. BO II is such an host dominance game compared to Mw2. If a whole team has full green bars while the other team has 3 yellow bars you are very likely to lose. (Until the green bars don't have common sense) If you know anything about Mw2 or did competitive you would know host did not mean shit as compared to BO II. Please don't say I'm completely bias because in my thread it clearly states pros about BO II(If you're going to make a counter-point argument on this comment)


The fact that you continue to say BO2 has better shotguns, "OP" snipers and better host advantage makes me question if you played very much MW2.

Host was everything in MW2. If you managed to pull host in MW2 you could be a god. Most people agree MW2 is a better game. Your arguments aren't very well thought out and you make asinine points. I don't get while you have this insatiable need for people to say BO2 sucks and MW2 is great. MW2 was a great game but it certainly wasny because it was so balanced and lacked "OP" shotguns and sniper rifles. MW2 was a innovative game and was made 4 years ago. It had the advantage of being something different and before we all have become bored of the COD series.

We get it, you don't enjoy BO2. Just don't play the game. BO2 isn't as good as MW2 and honestly barely beats out MW3 for me but it's still a decent game.

Lmao again at you saying BO2 shotguns are OP but MW2's aren't and host is a huge advantage inBO2 but in MW2 it didn't matter.

Next you're gonna say BO2's assault rifles are OP and MW2's were balanced. You don't have to make down right false claims to convince people MW2 was great.

The following user thanked Porter_Justice for this useful post:

RigorBro

The following user groaned Porter_Justice for this awful post:

Contributed

Copyright © 2026, NextGenUpdate.
All Rights Reserved.

Gray NextGenUpdate Logo