Here you go.
Host sucks on Black Ops 2- I think it just goes to show who the superior CoD makers are. It's amazing that taking 3 steps back had a much more exciting, free running game where if you died, you didn't feel so cheated - that you lost the gunfight fairly..
Modern Warfare 2
-Better maps
-Better flow
-Better hit detection
-Good story
-Well balanced
-Just a better game
-Pro Circuit was more competitive back then as to now
Black Ops 2
-Almost unplayable with lag
-Horrible hit detection
-Not great maps (New Maps are terrible)
-Biggest Connection Game Made
-Not a map in BO2 where you can cross the map without hitting a choke point.
-League play is cool
-Love how they took zombies to whole another level
-The whole objective thing is cool
-A lot of variety of guns you can use in competitive without having an unfair advantage.
-Ps3 frozed about 20 times total.
Fluidity: MW2
Weapons: MW2
Maps: MW2
Minigame: BOII (Zombies)
Playability: Mw2
Overall Mw2 is a way better game then BO II.
Originally posted by OVOXO
Stopped reading at MW2 well balanced.
Seriously? Blops2 has already had a couple of patches regarding balance issues; it took months for MW2 to even fix akimbo 1887s. Noob toobs are still not fixed after 3 years.
And "just a better game" as an argument?
Personally, I just think that people believe that MW2 is a better game because of the new stuff it brought to the MP metagame. Pro perks, more game modes, and just a general improvement in graphics and gameplay from the previous CoDs(WaW and MW1) just appealed to a large audience. Due to aging consoles, there really isn't that large of an improvement between each of the CoDs now, therefore making each seem more boring. Hopefully that will change with the next gen consoles though.
Oh REALLY? Did Mw2 ever freeze for you like BO II did? Did Mw2 have a bad as host change as BO II where the game just completely drops everytime a host changes. I didn't think so. Did Mw2 ever make you pay for shitty map packs and gay camos? Also, targeting recticles? Who the freak uses a targeting recticle lmao. BO II you seem to run into a choking point every corner you turn. Mw2 had much MORE balanced maps then BO II. Also, the shotguns and snipers are completely op'ed. League play noobs camp down in the 3rd hardpoint spot in HJ with Kap 40's and shotguns lol. When I mean balanced I mean that the shotguns couldn't kill you from a mile away and the snipers weren't so op'ed. Shock Charges are a also pretty stupid along with sensor grenades. Along with that, the hit detection is STRAIGHT GARBAGE. If I lost a gun fight in mw2, I can actually say I got killed FAIRLY. BO II is such an host dominance game compared to Mw2. If a whole team has full green bars while the other team has 3 yellow bars you are very likely to lose. (Until the green bars don't have common sense) If you know anything about Mw2 or did competitive you would know host did not mean shit as compared to BO II. Please don't say I'm completely bias because in my thread it clearly states pros about BO II(If you're going to make a counter-point argument on this comment)