Post: New Point System?
Options
08-03-2010, 06:43 AM
#1
crisisx1
Grunt
and the guy that has 30 kills and like 25 deaths wins...
And you over here have like 28 kills and 7 deaths...
In which only the amount of kills you have count, deaths really dont matter
I was thinking....
What if they invent a new point system, for example:
For every 10 deaths you have, you get one of your kills taken off... Or something in that sense as to where now, not only ur kills matter, but also the number of deaths...
So in the above stated example, the 28-7 guy would win, because the 30-25 guy would have two kills taken away from him because 10 ( 1 kill ) + 10 ( 1 kill ) + 5 (0 kill )= -2 kills (28-25)..
You get it?
Something in that nature... any ideas or comments?
08-03-2010, 08:39 PM
#30
crisisx1
Grunt
Yes and no to increasing campers...
Because we aren't talking about a significantly big ratio... its one kill taken away for every ten deaths you get.. so its not likw 5 kills per every 10 deaths
I mean you must suck in the first place to have 20 deaths, for that 2 minus kills to go into effect.
Because we aren't talking about a significantly big ratio... its one kill taken away for every ten deaths you get.. so its not likw 5 kills per every 10 deaths
I mean you must suck in the first place to have 20 deaths, for that 2 minus kills to go into effect.
08-04-2010, 12:12 AM
#32
xFGKx_Icon
Banned
I don't know about this but I do hate it when I join in the middle of a game and I was like 27-3 and the guy who won was 30-22 or something and they think they are all good becaue they won. Nice post anyway 
08-04-2010, 03:04 AM
#33
xVii-
Big Sister
Originally posted by Onehungrywater
Honestly this is how i play, rush kill a few die, rush kill a few die, and repeat until I win. Your point system is encouraging camping, because if you lost points for dieing than people will rely on camping to keep your deaths to a minimum
So you're suggesting that they keep catering to the less talented players?
08-04-2010, 03:10 AM
#34
Onehungrywater
Vault dweller
Originally posted by xVii
So you're suggesting that they keep catering to the less talented players?
So what your telling me is that it takes less talent to run into an enemy area than it does to sit in a corner waiting for someone to come by
08-04-2010, 03:14 AM
#35
xVii-
Big Sister
Originally posted by Onehungrywater
So what your telling me is that it takes less talent to run into an enemy area than it does to sit in a corner waiting for someone to come by
No, the fact that this would encourage camping would be outweighed by the benefit of having a person that goes 29-1 win over someone who went 30-29, regardless of how they play. Camping is always going to be a part of CoD, people might as well acknowledge that, and start recognizing that not all good scores result from camping.
08-04-2010, 04:47 AM
#36
Onehungrywater
Vault dweller
Originally posted by xVii
No, the fact that this would encourage camping would be outweighed by the benefit of having a person that goes 29-1 win over someone who went 30-29, regardless of how they play. Camping is always going to be a part of CoD, people might as well acknowledge that, and start recognizing that not all good scores result from camping.
No, Camping was not a bad part of COD4 or W@W, Only MW2. If treyarch did this (Which they wont) Camping will be a major part of black ops. Treyarch needs to encourage the score of 30-29. You are one of the campers who would like this because then there would be less people coming up to you killing you.
The following user thanked Onehungrywater for this useful post:
08-04-2010, 04:02 PM
#37
Ayon Windsor
Brute
Originally posted by Onehungrywater
No, Camping was not a bad part of COD4 or W@W, Only MW2. If treyarch did this (Which they wont) Camping will be a major part of black ops. Treyarch needs to encourage the score of 30-29. You are one of the campers who would like this because then there would be less people coming up to you killing you.
Thank you sir! I will w+rep this into paper ôo.
Copyright © 2026, NextGenUpdate.
All Rights Reserved.
