(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); [ame=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AYUryAssMPc&feature=player_embedded]YouTube - Call of Duty: Black Ops - Multiplayer Gameplay Summit, Cracked, LauchPad *NEW*[/ame]

Nooo, this proves that Slight of Hand pro is Faster ADS. Watch the first part, the dude with the AUG had slight of hand Pro and the second part the dude took longer to aim down his sights.

Nooo, why Treyarch WHY!! I hate MW2 sniping!

Are you stupid? I'm saying there will be less quick scopers because the other 2 perks are very valuable for sniping. More people will take advantage of those perks, so you will see less quick scopers. How hard is that to understand?

That doesn't make sense though. If someone wants to quick scope they will just use sleight of hand and they wouldn't even need iron lungs/steady aim, so there wouldn't be less quickscopers. People don't quick scope just because they have sleight of hand, they do it for fun/to show off. Why would these types of people want to hard scope and use iron lungs?

We don't know what effect Sleight of Hand has on snipers yet so we cannot say anything.
Maybe for some reason Treyarch decided to make Sleight of Hand a bit slower on the snipers. If there was no Sleight of Hand, people could still quickscope because I know people that quickscope with marathon on MW2.

Fuuuuuuuuuu

Aww man...

I'm just saying there will be less because a lot of people would rather use steady aim or iron lungs, unlike MW2 where sleight of hand was a no brainer to use because it didn't take those two perks away.

That still doesn't make much sense, but ok. There would be less people using sleight of hand, not less people quick scoping.

Using sleight of hand =/= quick scoping.

But some people (mainly the crappy ones) need and must use sleight of hand in order to quick scope. . .

Exactly, so they would still pick sleight of hand over iron lungs or steady aim.