Post: Slight of Hand PRO Is Faster ADS, NOOOO
09-04-2010, 12:05 AM #1
Waffle-Killer
Bounty hunter
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); [ame=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AYUryAssMPc&feature=player_embedded]YouTube - Call of Duty: Black Ops - Multiplayer Gameplay Summit, Cracked, LauchPad *NEW*[/ame]

Nooo, this proves that Slight of Hand pro is Faster ADS. Watch the first part, the dude with the AUG had slight of hand Pro and the second part the dude took longer to aim down his sights.

Nooo, why Treyarch WHY!! I hate MW2 sniping!
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

The following 2 users say thank you to Waffle-Killer for this useful post:

gtav, HeadHunterM7
09-04-2010, 09:06 PM #29
lilnatsfan44
At least I can fight
Originally posted by Travis
Exactly, so they would still pick sleight of hand over iron lungs or steady aim.


But some people would rather have steady aim or iron lungs instead of trying to quick scope.
09-04-2010, 09:46 PM #30
Originally posted by lilnatsfan44 View Post
But some people would rather have steady aim or iron lungs instead of trying to quick scope.


If someone would rather use steady aim or iron lungs then they wouldn't be quick scoping in the first place, so there won't be less quick scopers because of this. There will be less people using sleight of hand, but just because you have sleight of hand that doesn't mean you HAVE to quick scope.
09-04-2010, 10:05 PM #31
Securing_Bravo
~ The Graphics Room ~
Originally posted by Travis
1. Why would you need iron lungs if quick scoping? xD
2. You're bad if you quick scope with Steady Aim, durrr.


Not necessarily because steady aim only increases hip fire accuracy, (shooting without aiming down your sight.) so that doesn't really determine whether you're a good quick scoper or not..
09-04-2010, 10:31 PM #32
Pro Perks have been classified. Journalists cant use them. Only internal beta testers.
09-04-2010, 11:00 PM #33
vladieboi
oh hai mark
How do you know he had sleight of hand pro? /facepalm
09-05-2010, 12:02 AM #34
lilnatsfan44
At least I can fight
Originally posted by travis
if someone would rather use steady aim or iron lungs then they wouldn't be quick scoping in the first place, so there won't be less quick scopers because of this. There will be less people using sleight of hand, but just because you have sleight of hand that doesn't mean you have to quick scope.


exactly! Some people are going to use steady aim or iron lungs and not quick scope!!
09-05-2010, 12:22 AM #35
3ptO
version 3.0
Originally posted by EJ94c View Post
wow, the guns actually have recoil.


Way better this way. More realistic and skill orientated.

Anyways,
Sleight of Hand Pro isn't only for Snipers...
Especially since people consider ADS is longer in the first place.
09-05-2010, 12:30 AM #36
Honk
Brute
Originally posted by vladieboi View Post
How do you know he had sleight of hand? /facepalm

the reload time in the vid is kinda obvious. Watch it cloesly how fast he reloads the AUG and how "slow" he reloads the SMG. Thats proof enough that he had SOH with the AUG.
09-05-2010, 12:44 AM #37
Originally posted by Bravo View Post
Not necessarily because steady aim only increases hip fire accuracy, (shooting without aiming down your sight.) so that doesn't really determine whether you're a good quick scoper or not..


I was being sarcastic about that part because those "pro quick scopers" always say that.

---------- Post added at 08:44 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:43 PM ----------

Originally posted by lilnatsfan44 View Post
exactly! Some people are going to use steady aim or iron lungs and not quick scope!!


We are never going to come to an agreement on this, so yeah people will use steady aim and iron lungs.

Copyright © 2026, NextGenUpdate.
All Rights Reserved.

Gray NextGenUpdate Logo