(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); the title says it all! DID THEY REVEAL EVERYTHING FOR MULTYPLAYER!?

First off, Ford didn't make the first automobile. The first automobile used a steam engine, and was made in 18th century France. You copied and pasted your old post & posted it again with maybe 3 words changed. I'm pretty sure that would qualify. Now you're insulting me personally? Seriously Bro? :bro:

Quoted from JD_2020, This can be found on the COD Forums

"Hi guys,

There's been some quotes taken out of context that I wanted to clear up before they get too out of hand. What we showed you on September 1st was, for the most part (99.9%), everything you'll have in the box. When I said "We haven't shown everything yet" - the full quote was "We haven't shown everything yet; there are things that we didn't put in the presentation, but are there for you to find: like Host Migration, Prestige Leaderboards, In-Game Friends List, etc."

When editors write articles, they'll cut quotes down to keep their paragraphs concise, which isn't necessarily a bad thing, but communities sometimes overreact heh. We also didn't put everything in the presentation we showed, because that would have been way too much information for consumption in one sitting.

So everything was there... We're just not going to release our Game Design Doc in written format. Rest assured, there will be things you'll be uncovering once you get the game you didn't hear about. The really important things (core gameplay, new game modes, fundamental changes) have been communicated, though.

But we only showed 4 maps a the MP Event, we only leveled the accounts to Rank 25 (so not all weapons were unlocked), and not many people unlocked any Pro Perks at the event - so that's what I was referring to with my quote. There is plenty still yet to be uncovered. That's the point of ranking up, to view the "Classified" components to MP .

Hope that helps.
-JD"

Telling you to search on google isn't personal :rolleyes:
Yes, I copied and pasted it because after telling you twice to look at my next post you ignorantly continued to critisise my previous post which I elaborated on in the one I had to re post. It's only double posting if it's done in succession to the previous post. Actually I meant the first commercial car which used a traditional engine, which I actually got wrong aswell. So you're wrong too. It was Mercedes Benz but it was only an analogy so I don't see why you're being so pedantic and critical about it

You called me a, "smart arse." I take offense to that. :tits: Now you're calling me ignorant, I might just that that offensively too. What you mean and what 'chu say is different Boy.

1807 - Francois Isaac de Rivaz of Switzerland invented an internal combustion engine that used a mixture of hydrogen and oxygen for fuel. Rivaz designed a car for his engine - the first internal combustion powered automobile. However, his was a very unsuccessful design.

From here - You must login or register to view this content.

If that's what you mean by a traditional engine, then there ya go.

Wow, that's really sad. It was an analogy. Not a history lesson. I re posted as you ignored the post where I corrected myself, and after pointing you to the next post you just quote my previous post again. 'Smart arse' isn't personal. If I were to find out your insecurities and mock them, that's personal.
Must be you?
You must login or register to view this content.

You can't tell me what I take personally, Mister. I could be sensitive, you know?

---------- Post added at 03:45 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:44 PM ----------



And no, that's not me. If you need to see me I'll gladly post a picture.

highly doubt it

Still some surprises up there sleeves!