Post: Don't you wish the M16 was more like the one in MW2?
11-16-2010, 01:58 AM #1
Febreze
Keepin' it FRESH
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); It just feels... So less powered now. In Mw2, it was like one burst in the chest KILLS. Anyone feels the same way? Oh ya... Don't get me started on the sniping.... /facepalm
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
11-16-2010, 02:40 AM #20
Febreze
Keepin' it FRESH
Originally posted by Justice View Post
YES YES YES A HUNDRED TIMES YES!!! I was just thinking about this today at work(slow work day lol). On MW2 I used the Tar or Mini Uzi my first 3 Prestiges, then the last Prestige and a half I started to use the M16 and if you have some sort of aim IT IS A BEAST. Though it's not effective for those used to spraying and praying. But I am pissed at the M16 sometimes on BO. There have been numerous times when I've shot a guy's chest, he sways, i shoot his chest again, he sways, I shoot again to kill him or he kills me by this point. It's like you literally have to put 2 consecutive bursts into him for them to die.


Exactly. SOMEONE knows what i'm talking about.
11-16-2010, 02:46 AM #21
Porter_Justice
Cake is a lie
Originally posted by DevTheGreat9 View Post
Exactly. SOMEONE knows what i'm talking about.


Haha I justified the M16 power because it's an American weapon. America **** YEAH haha.

But I am with you, but I was one of those guys on MW2 that didn't care what gun someone else used as long as it's not a noobtube. I take some bum rocking an UMP with SP as a challenge to kill him with my M16 or even the Mini-Uzi. I'd rather take that challenge then cry, "Oh his gun is so overpowered blah blah blah". My K/D was still decent and I was a team player shooting down KS so why cry about the little stuff ya know? I hear the G11 is what the M16 was like in MW2, and I'm almost about to reach that.

What I do find funny is all the guys who love the AK74u and don't realize it's like the new MP40 from W@W or the UMP minus the long range foolishness. Check your deaths and see what gun you got killed by the most, I'll bet it's not the M16!
11-16-2010, 03:26 AM #22
Originally posted by xd366 View Post
these threads are annoying and pointless. stop complaining and get used to the game


I soooo agree :bro:
11-16-2010, 03:53 AM #23
ndru98
Bounty hunter
I think the M16 is fine . It's usually 1 burst for me . If not an extra bullet solves that . There are 2 burst fires in this gun btw . If you dislike the M16 that much , then use the G11 . Last assault rifle unlocked . It is a tad bit superior than the M16 , but the M16 is still very much useable .
11-16-2010, 04:22 AM #24
Solo
Rookie
Throw an ACOG on the M16 & you've got yourself a great gun. With Sleight oh Hand Pro, it's very versatile. The ACOG has no sway, so it's a great attachment, don't overlook it!

The following 3 users say thank you to Solo for this useful post:

bronxny10460, HitMarkerHeaven, Porter_Justice
11-16-2010, 10:33 AM #25
Dan0692
Molestation Enthusiast
Originally posted by Justice View Post
Well if "everybody" used Stopping Power then how is it unbalanced????

Also to be honest the only 2nd tier perk that could be considered "unbalanced" is danger close and ESPECIALLY Danger Close Pro. If you have an M16, FAMAS(Just one extra burst), Tar, UMP, FAL, Scar, Aug Hbar you still had plenty of bullet damage. But the advantage Danger Close Pro gives to me outweighs slightly less bullet damage.

Predator Missiles with Danger Close Pro in Team Matches gets you at minimum Double/Triple kills that you wouldn't get without it. Harriers, Pavelows, Chopper Gunners and AC-130 are like Barry Bonds on Steroids.

I don't get why people hated Stopping Power so much when Danger Close is the 2nd tier perk from MW2 that took the least amount of skill especially when Noobtubes and OMA were equipped. I mean an UMP without SP is as powerful as any gun with Stopping Power and when you add Danger Close to that we are talking SERIOUS carnage.


Because if you didn't use juggernaught or stopping power, you were more than certainly likely to get killed by people who do. They were more powerful and effective than other perks.

Originally posted by Justice View Post
Well if "everybody" used Stopping Power then how is it unbalanced????


It's unbalanced because everyone HAD to use it, as stated above.
11-16-2010, 11:28 AM #26
Porter_Justice
Cake is a lie
Originally posted by Dan0692 View Post
Because if you didn't use juggernaught or stopping power, you were more than certainly likely to get killed by people who do. They were more powerful and effective than other perks.



It's unbalanced because everyone HAD to use it, as stated above.


In W@W sure but it MW2 you didn't have to use SP to be effective. Look how many noobs used Danger Close Pro. I'm fine without Stopping Power because nobody has it which is fair. But people will still complain that some guns are "overpowered". Can't please us all I suppose.

I see your point in a way but I've seen guys use a Vector with Lightweight as their 2nd perk lol. I'm sure they felt being able to run faster and knife people was cool,made me happy to Tar them up!
11-16-2010, 11:29 AM #27
Dan0692
Molestation Enthusiast
Originally posted by Justice View Post
In W@W sure but it MW2 you didn't have to use SP to be effective. Look how many noobs used Danger Close Pro. I'm fine without Stopping Power because nobody has it which is fair. But people will still complain that some guns are "overpowered". Can't please us all I suppose.

I see your point in a way but I've seen guys use a Vector with Lightweight as their 2nd perk lol. I'm sure they felt being able to run faster and knife people was cool,made me happy to Tar them up!


Well I think they've taken the right things out and the additions are balanced and clever. I guess we'll have to agree to disagree

The following user thanked Dan0692 for this useful post:

Porter_Justice
11-16-2010, 12:54 PM #28
It is the same thing but no stopping power in Black Ops. Use the G11.

Copyright © 2026, NextGenUpdate.
All Rights Reserved.

Gray NextGenUpdate Logo