Post: Treyarch busted: Rumor (Not verified yet)
12-03-2010, 04:02 PM #1
dOlLoFf
Vault dweller
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
Originally posted by another user
Many gaming sites are now reporting that an ex Activision employee has spilled the beans about Activision making Treyarch make a crappy port for the PS3. Apparently the frame rate and inferior graphics problems are due to Treyarch making the game so the PS3 memory is not 100% utilized.


You must login or register to view this content.

You must login or register to view this content.
You must login or register to view this content. SO..yeah if this is true i'm so mad..
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

The following 2 users say thank you to dOlLoFf for this useful post:

-Syed-, Siberian Husky
12-04-2010, 02:34 AM #47
ZoneHD
Shiver do you lift?
Already been posted.
12-04-2010, 03:03 AM #48
Originally posted by 020king View Post
are u josh olins dad? lmao be patient its going to come? put it this way, u give a whore some money an she will do anything u tell her to...etc
microsoft payed the whore activision to make ps3 basically shit to play black ops, so ps3 users will sell ps3 an buy xbox360, treyarch games has always been shittt, only zombies are good, the whole cod name got famous because of infinityward, although infinityward got sacked, i think they made the best cod games ever, i think they got sacked because activision told them to make it shitttt for ps3 so they told activision fuk off, i hope infinityward make their own game, no partner shittt with anyone and bang put a fps, then fuk activision, if the rumour is true which is highly likely, then microsoft is gonna catch hiv or aids of activision and they will both dieeeee LOL

---------- Post added at 07:50 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:32 PM ----------




trust sony has a shittt load stacked up, ps1 ps2, was u still wearing a nappy at those times? before even xbox existed sony had bills, and then their other sony products, i wont even bother mention those, sony is not a money whore, but microsoft is, sony has brain look how instantly they banged out a update for that jail break, they care about their playstation users, so now u gonna say microsoft pay extra so xbox can get dlc 1month quicker, nope, they dont care about u they are only thinking about them selves, they are thinking they can steal
ps3 users by releasing a 1 month dlc, LOL. so u cant say sony has no money, why else are microsoft trying to get quicker dlc and pay activision to make ps3 game play shittt? bcuz they know sony has snow fall of customers so they trying to buy them over


Like many things Sony has a budget. They're going to spend the money they earn on the ps1 to improve that and to develop the ps2. Then they will keep the rest of the money. Its not like they just saved up all their money for the ps3. They're not going to spend money they earn off of their T.V.'s on the ps3. Also when you say that Sony banged out a patch for the psJailbreak that's not because they care about us, it's because they care about their name. Honestly, it was a really un-wise choice of them too. It could have brought in more customers and if it was really about us, they would have not patched it. I don't know what it is about developers, but they have the wrong idea. They think it's bad for people to run homebrew games, and improve their systems.

---------- Post added at 10:03 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:58 PM ----------

Originally posted by Justice View Post
You're actually trying to blame Sony for not having extra funds specifically to pay devs to **** up other systems or pay for demos early?

I'm very happy with my system and I don't fault Sony for not trying to make under the table deals. Besides Sony will make their extra money next Gen when Xbox more than likely will be helping Sony profits a little with Blu Ray gaming.

With all that said, I'll go play Black Ops on my cousin's 360 and see what it looks like. I can believe the lag and shit isn't as bad as PS3 but there is no way in hell the graphics are that much better, because the graphics on BO sucks compared to MW2.

A lot of the PS3 disconnects I think are from bums quitting and the lack of succesful host migrations on PS3....Are you saying 360 doesn't have all these disconnects and host migrations even when you know it's just someone quitting?


Well, lets talk about the graphics shall we. There was already a noticible difference with the graphics on the 360 compared to those on the PS3. The most obvious was a small, but nice looking thing. The ammo counter on the 360 looked a lot nicer than it did on the ps3. So there is no doubt that it was going to stay the way it was last game with the 360 getting the better graphics.
12-04-2010, 03:11 AM #49
Porter_Justice
Cake is a lie
Originally posted by FourzerotwoFAILS View Post


Well, lets talk about the graphics shall we. There was already a noticible difference with the graphics on the 360 compared to those on the PS3. The most obvious was a small, but nice looking thing. The ammo counter on the 360 looked a lot nicer than it did on the ps3. So there is no doubt that it was going to stay the way it was last game with the 360 getting the better graphics.


I am interested in the Lag/Disconnect/Host Migration differences since I doubt the minor details you speak of are game sellers at all. Xbox 360 is a great system but I don't know why 360 fans and especially fanboys act as if PS3 is an inferior system based off graphics of 3rd party games.

Microsoft pays the big bucks to devs and they are cheaper to dev for. 360 isn't an inherently better system. I mean imagine if Black Ops could have 50GB worth of space on disk.

I look at it like women haha.

A.)PS3 is a beautiful woman who has intellect, a great body and potential to be a great wife but it'll take a strong type of man to get her full potential.

B.) 360 is a good looking, party girl who is fun to be with, easy to handle and her cooking is okay.

Now you can be happy with either girl, but most guys will go for the one who is easier because let's face it they both have a vagina(play games) so why not go with the easier one.

Even if you do have to pay for drinks and buy shit for that slutty but fun 360 girl!!!!!!!!!

And at the end of the day IF this is true, regardless of what system you own Microsoft is shitty for doing this...IF this happens. But i mean if they can pay to get demos a week earlier who knows what else they could do.
12-04-2010, 03:20 AM #50
Originally posted by Justice View Post
I am interested in the Lag/Disconnect/Host Migration differences since I doubt the minor details you speak of are game sellers at all. Xbox 360 is a great system but I don't know why 360 fans and especially fanboys act as if PS3 is an inferior system based off graphics of 3rd party games.

Microsoft pays the big bucks to devs and they are cheaper to dev for. 360 isn't an inherently better system. I mean imagine if Black Ops could have 50GB worth of space on disk.

I look at it like women haha.

A.)PS3 is a beautiful woman who has intellect, a great body and potential to be a great wife but it'll take a strong type of man to get her full potential.

B.) 360 is a good looking, party girl who is fun to be with, easy to handle and her cooking is okay.

Now you can be happy with either girl, but most guys will go for the one who is easier because let's face it they both have a vagina(play games) so why not go with the easier one.

Even if you do have to pay for drinks and buy shit for that slutty but fun 360 girl!!!!!!!!!

And at the end of the day IF this is true, regardless of what system you own Microsoft is shitty for doing this...IF this happens. But i mean if they can pay to get demos a week earlier who knows what else they could do.


Well what's the point in having something that has the potential to be better than the other system, if the devs will never make it as good? Another reason why devs work so hard to please xbox is because they have more people, and with more people comes more money. Also, with host migration/lag and all that jazz, it's going to be worse on the ps3. This is because Microsoft has the extra money to spend on helping Activision out with their servers.
12-04-2010, 03:24 AM #51
020king
< ^ > < ^ >
Originally posted by FourzerotwoFAILS View Post
Like many things Sony has a budget. They're going to spend the money they earn on the ps1 to improve that and to develop the ps2. Then they will keep the rest of the money. Its not like they just saved up all their money for the ps3. They're not going to spend money they earn off of their T.V.'s on the ps3. Also when you say that Sony banged out a patch for the psJailbreak that's not because they care about us, it's because they care about their name. Honestly, it was a really un-wise choice of them too. It could have brought in more customers and if it was really about us, they would have not patched it. I don't know what it is about developers, but they have the wrong idea. They think it's bad for people to run homebrew games, and improve their systems.

---------- Post added at 10:03 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:58 PM ----------



Well, lets talk about the graphics shall we. There was already a noticible difference with the graphics on the 360 compared to those on the PS3. The most obvious was a small, but nice looking thing. The ammo counter on the 360 looked a lot nicer than it did on the ps3. So there is no doubt that it was going to stay the way it was last game with the 360 getting the better graphics.



do you even have a clue what the jailbreak could have done? besides the little challenge lobby shittt for mw2, if used at its full potential it would have become something like the psp, which lead to free games and shittt like that, u or i wouldnt like it if we built up a gaming console and 1 leak ruined it, so they covered their assss and apart from the little teenagers who hack the games and ruin gaming for everyone, yh when i think of xbox i think jtagg hacked= unfair gameplay, when i think of ps3 i think clear as ice, no hacking= fair for everyone, y am i on here for if i dont like hacking? i agree to hacking to some extent, like prestige, i dont have time to sit at home all day and prestige a shit load of times, so thats y im here oh and to check some good spots, but i disagree with all that hacking deeply to get free games an run homebrews, if u dont buy the games then their wont be a next console so, u fuk up shittt for urself and everyone else, if people cant afford the games then i think they must have stole the console lol cant afford it dnt buy it simples, u lnow where all the latest technology is at? japan, which is where ps3 is developed,

remember its not about quantity its about quality
12-04-2010, 03:26 AM #52
Anthony
$10 for this? Im poor now
Call of Duty Series never cares about Sony. They care about Microsoft more. Why do you think in Modern Warfare 2 that they get their map packs early? Same thing is going to happen again. They are just getting bribbed by Microsoft.
12-04-2010, 03:32 AM #53
Originally posted by 020king View Post
do you even have a clue what the jailbreak could have done? besides the little challenge lobby shittt for mw2, if used at its full potential it would have become something like the psp, which lead to free games and shittt like that, u or i wouldnt like it if we built up a gaming console and 1 leak ruined it, so they covered their assss and apart from the little teenagers who hack the games and ruin gaming for everyone, yh when i think of xbox i think jtagg hacked= unfair gameplay, when i think of ps3 i think clear as ice, no hacking= fair for everyone, y am i on here for if i dont like hacking? i agree to hacking to some extent, like prestige, i dont have time to sit at home all day and prestige a shit load of times, so thats y im here oh and to check some good spots, but i disagree with all that hacking deeply to get free games an run homebrews, if u dont buy the games then their wont be a next console so, u fuk up shittt for urself and everyone else, if people cant afford the games then i think they must have stole the console lol cant afford it dnt buy it simples, u lnow where all the latest technology is at? japan, which is where ps3 is developed,

remember its not about quantity its about quality


Well I read the first to sentences in this fight then stoped. You originally said that they patched it for us, now you're saying they patched it for them. Look at the iPod, sure you can get free games and stuff, but there are many other amazing things people have done with it like homebrew apps. There are also still those people that buy the apps anyway.

Edit: Just read some more lines and you say "Jtaged=unfair gameplay" Then you say that you prestige hack. You are aware that what you are doing is unfair gameplay too. Yes there are some lobbies that people just use godmode and dominate, but most of them are just challenge lobbies. Also you complain about glitches, yet the only reason why you can do the prestige glitch is because it's a GLITCH! You really need to pick a side and stay on it.

---------- Post added at 10:32 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:30 PM ----------

Originally posted by SmashBrosFan11 View Post
Call of Duty Series never cares about Sony. They care about Microsoft more. Why do you think in Modern Warfare 2 that they get their map packs early? Same thing is going to happen again. They are just getting bribbed by Microsoft.


They don't care about Microsoft, they care about Microsoft's money. Money is everything to everyone.
12-04-2010, 03:41 AM #54
Anthony
$10 for this? Im poor now
Originally posted by FourzerotwoFAILS View Post
Well I read the first to sentences in this fight then stoped. You originally said that they patched it for us, now you're saying they patched it for them. Look at the iPod, sure you can get free games and stuff, but there are many other amazing things people have done with it like homebrew apps. There are also still those people that buy the apps anyway.

Edit: Just read some more lines and you say "Jtaged=unfair gameplay" Then you say that you prestige hack. You are aware that what you are doing is unfair gameplay too. Yes there are some lobbies that people just use godmode and dominate, but most of them are just challenge lobbies. Also you complain about glitches, yet the only reason why you can do the prestige glitch is because it's a GLITCH! You really need to pick a side and stay on it.


---------- Post added at 10:32 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:30 PM ----------



They don't care about Microsoft, they care about Microsoft's money. Money is everything to everyone.



Well Ps3 doesn't want to waste their money on 1 of their many games they make. They don't care about our happiness, i agree. Our money = happy Sony. Our happiness = Sony no care
12-04-2010, 03:43 AM #55
Porter_Justice
Cake is a lie
Originally posted by FourzerotwoFAILS View Post
Well what's the point in having something that has the potential to be better than the other system, if the devs will never make it as good? Another reason why devs work so hard to please xbox is because they have more people, and with more people comes more money. Also, with host migration/lag and all that jazz, it's going to be worse on the ps3. This is because Microsoft has the extra money to spend on helping Activision out with their servers.


You make valid points.

So how about they lower the PS3 version. Don't charge us the same price if we gonna get less things, WTF.

As gamers we paying the same price.

Copyright © 2026, NextGenUpdate.
All Rights Reserved.

Gray NextGenUpdate Logo