(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); This is my first post and just thought I'd see what you thought. Its so dumb how the Barrett gets hit markers and I no this pisses you guys off. LOL so here u go...

[ame="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1fCZvOHd5dg&feature=fvw"]YouTube- 50 Cal vs Bullet Proof Glass[/ame]

Oh I love getting hit markers with Stealth Bombers. That's really annoying.

No-one complained about it in COD4. It was just perfect there. It might have been a one shot kill but it has massive recoil and lots and lots of scope sway.

I say they keep all the guns from Cod4 and put the same stats on them, and give the newer guns power bases upon how much power they would've had in Cod4.

And definitely make snipers a one hit kill without stopping. I remember I used to suck at sniping in Cod5 because I never used stopping power because I was so used to being satisfied in Cod4 with another perk besides stopping power.

intervention is worse than 50 cal for hitmarkers, but i agree with the ketchup theory haha

Errr ive had no problem with the barrett. 50cal with no - scopes and quick is seems to be better...

But as far as the intervention goes.... i think its horrible..

Or maybe its all ya rubbish aiming ????

A .50 Calibre bullet WOUDLN'T tear your limbs off, it's like any other bullet, just with a half-inch diametre. You guys make it out like it's ****ing explosive or some shit. It'd hurt like holy hell but tearing people's limbs off? No way. It'd probably do so much damage you'd need to be amputated, but it wouldn't actually rip someone's arm off. It'd most likely leave their arm hanging by muscle and tendons, but unless it was a .50 Calibre Browning Machine Gun, I don't think it'd fully dismember a limb from it's body.

dylan_owns 50 cal can shoot threw tank armour i think it could tear someones limbs lol..

Its not ketchup, its GRAPE JELLY LOL.