(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); DLC's are made to add in parts of a game unobtainable without downloading after release. Maps are fine, because it's not something that really affects everyone. But when someone in Afghan shoots me(after DLC) with a skorpion and I'm sitting there with the shitty gUMP45 that I have, I will most likely rage quit.

DLC's IMO is made for maps. Not for perks; and not for guns. You shouldn't have to pay $15 to get 3 guns and 3 perks. That should be out of the package, and made free, sperately.

Opinions?
EDIT: You guys completely misunderstood me. First off, my info came from a thread in this very section, just look around. Secondly, it doesn't matter what ****ing gun I'm talking about. I say UMP and everyone freaks out. **** guys, that's not the point. The point is someone PAID to get a new gun, when it should of been in the game already..

Uh no its not.
Whered you get that idea?