Post: Treyarch > Iw?
05-21-2010, 10:20 PM #1
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); First of all im not one of those people that just jump from bandwagon to bandwagon i have a view on things and just because everybody says something dosn't mean its true. ( yeah i liked waw better than cod4 )


I think that treyarch is better than IW for the following reasons.

1) Campaign was a lot more epic -- mainly because you could play with a lot of people.

2) 4 player co op, yes nazi zombies.

3) Graphics looked more realistic and detailed, it looks less cartoonish.

4) A lot of support as 3 map packs

5) Better encrypted code... meaning no wall hacks inf ammo see through walls ect.

So the other side would be Iw and all i like from them is pretty much

sleight of hand pro, n game winning kill cams. But commando inf noob tubes, op killstreaks, campers ( idc what you say campers are easier to kill in WAW and thats a fact ) , heartbeat sensors, no fully auto no recoil snipers ( ACR lol. ) and probally a whole bunch of other shit im forgetting to mention.

I didn't know what a rage quit was before Mw2, and i use to laugh at people who would get angry because of a video game. Now im one of them.
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
05-21-2010, 10:35 PM #2
Naruto
Dark Knight
I go for Treyarch. Modern Warfare 2 became a downhill game since minors play it all the time.
05-21-2010, 11:08 PM #3
NeedaLifeSoon
Retired Life
As I remember it, when Treyarch first released W@W, the first month or two was filled with under map glitching. You could fire your flame thrower from under the map and look like a volcano going off.
Downfall,Seelow,Roundhouse, Outskirts and Courtyard all had wall breach or under map issues as well as elevators, skywalking, and numerous other glitches that tooks months to repair.
There were regular complaints about the tanks being overpowered as well as mp40 being overused. The larger maps had constant complaints for being camper or sniper friendly.
There were regular rants about how much better IW was on their Modern Warfare edtion and MANY players went back to it after several months of playing W@W.

The entire HYPE on MW2, before its release , was how much better the designers were at IW. Modern warfare was a much better game than W@W and this was going to be THE BEST COD GAME yet, even the BEST FPS game ever made.

With the record sales, still overwhelming amount of online gameplay, and amount of online RANTING and RAVING, I think it is still the number one FPS game ever.

I hope that Treyarch can out do IW on their Black Ops release.
There are several issues with MW2 that have changed the way many people play, especially the extended killstreaks.

But as of now, with Modern Warfare and MW2 under their belts, IW still wins the game design award.
05-21-2010, 11:12 PM #4
Xvailer
League Champion
To be honest I cant decide I honestly like both of them but I like treyarch alot more they go further back they made the first orginal CoD's which there were some bonus ones for the PC which I havent tried but kinda wanna and then theres CoD5 with the awsome multiplayer and Nazi zombies which is so much fun and there releasing a new one CoD black ops which looks sick! and IW only made CoD4 and MW2 which yeah there fun but there are alot of hackers and other stuff so Id have to possiably say Treyarch because there arent alot of hackers anymore on Nazi zombies and rarely on Multiplayer Smile
05-21-2010, 11:24 PM #5
Greg241
Bounty hunter
ya same i cant decided which one I like better. I have to play cod7 to really decide.
05-21-2010, 11:25 PM #6
Treyarch FTW black ops looks so awsome i love the way that crossbow looks
05-21-2010, 11:57 PM #7
Originally posted by needalifesoon View Post
As I remember it, when Treyarch first released W@W, the first month or two was filled with under map glitching. You could fire your flame thrower from under the map and look like a volcano going off.
Downfall,Seelow,Roundhouse, Outskirts and Courtyard all had wall breach or under map issues as well as elevators, skywalking, and numerous other glitches that tooks months to repair.
There were regular complaints about the tanks being overpowered as well as mp40 being overused. The larger maps had constant complaints for being camper or sniper friendly.
There were regular rants about how much better IW was on their Modern Warfare edtion and MANY players went back to it after several months of playing W@W.

The entire HYPE on MW2, before its release , was how much better the designers were at IW. Modern warfare was a much better game than W@W and this was going to be THE BEST COD GAME yet, even the BEST FPS game ever made.

With the record sales, still overwhelming amount of online gameplay, and amount of online RANTING and RAVING, I think it is still the number one FPS game ever.

I hope that Treyarch can out do IW on their Black Ops release.
There are several issues with MW2 that have changed the way many people play, especially the extended killstreaks.

But as of now, with Modern Warfare and MW2 under their belts, IW still wins the game design award.




Kk since you started with the hacks of waw lemme start with Mw2's hacks.

- See through walls
- Red squares around enemies
- Extended radar
- Inf RPG ammo with dangor close and sleight of hand pro
- Inf care pack/ ed sentry guns
- Super speed
- Chopper gunner bullets
- Play the game as ac130s
- Super jump mode
- Perm thermal seight
- Inf ac130 ammo
- Camo on secondary guns
- Able to unlock hidden content ( very pathetic on Iw's part )
- Elevators GALORE
- Wall breaches
- Out of the map on almost every map now
- Shot gun jumps
- 10th Prestige hack ( BIGGEST FAIL EVER no sence of accomplishment)
- Unlock emblems and tittles hack


Im 100% sure that i listed about 1/10th of the possibilities with j-tag.

My first point being don't even compare the glitches and hacks that the games had you'll loose every time.

As for overpowered tanks and mp40 that palls in comparison to chopper gunners ( sure 11 killstreak still overpowered), commando and oma noob tubes.

As for your record sales that just = people wanting something new to play + hype.

If i knew the game was gonna be like this i still woulda bought it don't get me wrong im just saying that its not as fun as waw was.

To the people who played cod4 instead of cod5, Congrats but half of them didn't give WAW a decent shot because its a lot funner than cod4 even.

I laugh at people who say cod4 was balenced, every game is unbalenced all imma say is m16, ak47.
05-22-2010, 02:25 AM #8
Octavia
"PonyF ag"
You should have put a both vote.


~Elmo
05-22-2010, 05:14 PM #9
I voted for Trey because I hate all the hax in MW2
05-22-2010, 05:21 PM #10
Measton
Pokemon Trainer
Treyarch.

IW made bad choices, with having no beta for MW2, rushing the release date, not fixing hacks, etc. Hell, everyone should know anyways that the original MW was an ACCIDENT in its success. Didn't surprise me when MW2 started to flop and piss off the community.

And I hope to god I don't jinx this, but Black Ops will be sweet, just because Treyarch now knows what NOT to do, thanks to IW.

Copyright © 2026, NextGenUpdate.
All Rights Reserved.

Gray NextGenUpdate Logo