(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); First of all im not one of those people that just jump from bandwagon to bandwagon i have a view on things and just because everybody says something dosn't mean its true. ( yeah i liked waw better than cod4 )


I think that treyarch is better than IW for the following reasons.

1) Campaign was a lot more epic -- mainly because you could play with a lot of people.

2) 4 player co op, yes nazi zombies.

3) Graphics looked more realistic and detailed, it looks less cartoonish.

4) A lot of support as 3 map packs

5) Better encrypted code... meaning no wall hacks inf ammo see through walls ect.

So the other side would be Iw and all i like from them is pretty much

sleight of hand pro, n game winning kill cams. But commando inf noob tubes, op killstreaks, campers ( idc what you say campers are easier to kill in WAW and thats a fact ) , heartbeat sensors, no fully auto no recoil snipers ( ACR lol. ) and probally a whole bunch of other shit im forgetting to mention.

I didn't know what a rage quit was before Mw2, and i use to laugh at people who would get angry because of a video game. Now im one of them.

Wow how the tables have turned. I still remember a poll like this a while back. Treyarch was getting so much hate while IW were said to be the best, bla bla bla. Now that MW2 is a failure, everyone hops off IW's pencil and jumps right on Treyarch's. I wonder how this poll will switch if black ops fails.