(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); Just wondering what your opinions are. I think the Stun Grenades are bad just because your movement is slowed down. Flashbangs, you have atleast a bit of a chance to kill someone by spraying

Its all just what your using it for. Stun when you see them and your getting shot and flash if u see some guy camping orf something.

I think he's saying more of which is worse for you to get hit with, not which one is better to use.

Although perhaps I'm wrong.

flashes DEFINATLEY if theyre anywhere in your radius. it last for about 5 seconds of pure whited out screen while youre prone. if stuns do hit the ground near u, its not that bad, just tur in the direction that it was thrown from and go prone to get a better shot.

but a combination of both is a nightmare! with u could choose 1 flash and 1 stun.

they both i guess in wher way hav ther upz n downz but i think stuns are the worst to get hit with cuz itz harder to move, but i think ther the best to use also

Stuns are better grenades than flashbangs. They can be thrown much faster and have a shorter effect radius which means you can use them at closer distances. Also restricting movements is much better than blinding the enemy. Flashbangs are a little more than annoying while i die almost everytime i get stunned.

STUNNNS OMFG So anooying ! :p

Yeah ben im saying which is worse i still say stun because you can hardly move if it hits you enough but flashbangs you still have a chance as a random kill even tho the radius like itsbigant91 said is much bigger to get hit with lol

u arent at an advantage if u are able to throw stuns faster. u just like fast paced gameplay.

i barely get killed while stunned. many people should use flashes more often because i hit the deck once im stunned. another plus is that flashes explode in mid air so u dont have to worry about an object blocking it and it having no affect. just aim for the sky.

I think Stun grenades are worse.