Post: Whats worse? Flashbangs, or Stun Grenades?
07-07-2010, 03:12 AM #1
bmxrcodol04
Im a Hitmarker
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); Just wondering what your opinions are. I think the Stun Grenades are bad just because your movement is slowed down. Flashbangs, you have atleast a bit of a chance to kill someone by spraying Claps
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
07-07-2010, 04:58 AM #11
itzbigant91
League Champion
Originally posted by bmxrcodol04 View Post
Yeah ben im saying which is worse :P i still say stun because you can hardly move if it hits you enough but flashbangs you still have a chance as a random kill even tho the radius like itsbigant91 said is much bigger to get hit with lol


yea u could just go advanced and change the title; ''whats worse to get hit with?'' (?)
07-07-2010, 04:59 AM #12
NeedaMilfSoon
In my man cave
i say stuns because you cannot move, although flashes have a bigger like explosive damage in sense, meaning they effect you father away then stuns do.
07-07-2010, 05:22 AM #13
scarene1
I defeated!
flashs are worse imo, they blind someone for several seconds, have a large radius so you can tell if someone is in the room you throw it in, but they also take longer to throw
07-07-2010, 05:42 AM #14
D_Fridge
Do a barrel roll!
Flashes are 300X worse. as you notice everytime you flash someone they almost always lay down lmao i do. Its just a habit. If you shoot and try to get a random kill they notice you. I use cold blooded so i do the triangle shit. but it always sucks being stuck for like 10 seconds waiting.
07-07-2010, 07:33 AM #15
Alex
Balls of Steel
I fudging hate when the flashbangs last an hour to wear off >:(
07-07-2010, 10:52 AM #16
nmhj
Keeper
I think stun is better cause u throw them faster and plus if there close a it explodes and theres a bit of white covering there screen so its both
07-07-2010, 01:24 PM #17
itzbigant91
League Champion
Originally posted by scarene1 View Post
flashs are worse imo, they blind someone for several seconds, have a large radius so you can tell if someone is in the room you throw it in, but they also take longer to throw


who cares if it takes a half second longer to throw. its way more effective. it is better because u can simply go prone while being stunned and kill the person like i do. when youre flased, u cannot see anything for 4 or 5 seconds if u can throw it accurately. most people i see just spam their stuns ad waste them and dont take the time to aim for the most effectiveness. plus it has to hit the ground in order to go off so youre screwed if it lands right in front of an object which would block its effect so u would have to land it right in the persons radius.

what people dont do is go prone when stunned when it could save your life more often.
07-07-2010, 01:25 PM #18
i hate stuns
07-07-2010, 01:30 PM #19
itzbigant91
League Champion
Originally posted by nmhj View Post
I think stun is better cause u throw them faster and plus if there close a it explodes and theres a bit of white covering there screen so its both


yea but its less effective and does less damage than a flash because u are aware of what is in front of u and could simply go prone when stunned to get better accuracy at the person when u try and shoot him.

---------- Post added at 09:30 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:29 AM ----------

Originally posted by WCE View Post
i hate stuns


because of the effect or using them?

Copyright © 2026, NextGenUpdate.
All Rights Reserved.

Gray NextGenUpdate Logo