Post: Why Ground Vehicles Were Left Out Of Modern Warfare 2 Multilpayer.
07-17-2010, 03:28 AM #1
Edgardo678
Little One
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); Below Is A Video Of Robert Bowling (fourzerotwo) and Lead Designer For Infinity Ward Todd Alderman Discussing The Video Game Hit
Call Of Duty 6: Modern Warfare 2.

[ame="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bsnBuZh1HVE"]YouTube - Vehicles Left Out of 'Modern Warfare 2'[/ame]

They Basically Just Said That They Didn't Add Vehicles Because They Want People To be Be Focused On Playing The Game And The Action Instead Of Fighting Over Who Gets The Vehicle. Even Though It Was Highly Requested By Fans They Just Don't Want To Ruin The Flow Of The Game.

What Do You Think?
Should There Be Ground Vehicles Or Is That Too Much Of An Advantage?

If So Should They Be Controllable Like The AC-130 Or Should They Be Automatic Like The Pavelow?
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
07-17-2010, 10:25 AM #11
they would have to make maps alot bigger and mw2 wouldnt be to great with vehicles tbh.
07-17-2010, 12:46 PM #12
ashbash
Space Ninja
i think vehicles was done perfectly on WaW, there were just 2 tanks, and 1 person could easily destroy a tank by themselves(hell its a tank, and 1 person can blow it up lol) so they were not overpowered, they only got alot of kills when n00bs refused to blow them up.

59-0 seelow <333
07-17-2010, 01:06 PM #13
Siimply Dank
iCantQuickscope
They don't have ground vehicles, but they do have manually controlled helicopters! And those suckers can get you 20+ kills if you're lucky.
07-17-2010, 08:33 PM #14
Edgardo678
Little One
Originally posted by Coooelho View Post
they would have to make maps alot bigger and mw2 wouldnt be to great with vehicles tbh.


Thats What The Lead Designer Said The Problem Was.
07-17-2010, 10:59 PM #15
Noob tubing is not awesome and i use them only when someone breaks the three strike rule. Then its me and 5 other people i play with using tubes and rpg's. The other team always loses when this happens btw.

I dont use it because its ridiculously cheap, overpowered, and takes zero skill to use.
07-17-2010, 11:12 PM #16
They should totally be included. Only reason I bought BFBC2 was because of the vehicles like the helicopters and tanks and destructible environment like buildings and cover
07-17-2010, 11:21 PM #17
Edgardo678
Little One
Originally posted by Cyber
They really would change the pace of the game a lot and would end up being overpowered.


Depends On Who's Behind The Gun.
07-17-2010, 11:24 PM #18
Cyber Altair
League Champion
Originally posted by Edgardo678 View Post
Depends On Who's Behind The Gun.


I'm pretty sure a first time player could still be a pain in the ass. Plus most of the levels would have to be reworked and end up being a lot bigger then what they are.
07-17-2010, 11:31 PM #19
MW2 and battlefield are two different games. They shouldnt be included in call of duty because call of duty already has kill streak rewards which are powerful enough. Also map size would become a major issue. Maps like wasteland and derail arent even big enough for player controled vehicles like tanks.

Also a players skill is what determines the outcome in call of duty (the exception being noob tubes and launchers). Tanks and other vehicles would create issues that would be considered cheap and overpowered by the majority of the mw2 community. Trust me the whining and complaining is bad enough already. Vehicles would only bring the game down and make it less enjoyable.

Copyright © 2026, NextGenUpdate.
All Rights Reserved.

Gray NextGenUpdate Logo